Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: keys-api interface #177

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

feat: keys-api interface #177

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 28, 2023

Conversation

vgorkavenko
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vgorkavenko vgorkavenko marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2023 05:23
@vgorkavenko vgorkavenko requested review from a team, madlabman and dgusakov June 28, 2023 05:23
@vgorkavenko vgorkavenko merged commit c7516af into develop Jun 28, 2023
@vgorkavenko vgorkavenko deleted the feat/keysapi-interface branch June 28, 2023 10:36
vgorkavenko added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2023
* feat: keys-api interface

* fix: test

* fix: add default value

* fix: remove db name from dashboard
@vgorkavenko vgorkavenko mentioned this pull request Jun 30, 2023
vgorkavenko added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2023
* feat: stuck keys (#170)

* feat: stuck validators keys

* fix: test

* feat: ignore stuck validators in dashboards

* chore: update nestjs, lido packages (#173)

* chore: update nestjs, lido packages

* chore: update test packages

* chore: update grafana (#174)

* feat: VALIDATOR_USE_STUCK_KEYS_FILE, readme (#175)

* feat: VALIDATOR_USE_STUCK_KEYS_FILE, readme

* chore: add note

* chore: add DB_PASSWORD to secrets mask (#176)

* feat: keys-api interface (#177)

* feat: keys-api interface

* fix: test

* fix: add default value

* fix: remove db name from dashboard

* fix: add label to metric (#178)

---------

Co-authored-by: Don Perignom <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants