Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SingleItem as subclass to Item #494

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024

Conversation

olovy
Copy link
Contributor

@olovy olovy commented Aug 19, 2024

This is a step on the way to #483

source/vocab/items.ttl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
source/vocab/items.ttl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@olovy olovy merged commit bde6b09 into develop Aug 20, 2024
@olovy olovy deleted the feature/lxl-4504-catalogue-single-item branch August 20, 2024 12:30
olovy added a commit to libris/librisxl that referenced this pull request Aug 20, 2024
…e-item

Make it possible to have linked SingleItem (sv: "Exemplar") inside Item hasComponent.

    SingleItem is in collection none instead of hold so that we don't get any of the special handling for holdings
        => it is possible to have multiple SingleItem records per library
        => it is not involved in MARC export except as an embellished hasComponent of a regular holding record
    Access control for holdings is extend to all subclasses of Item instead of just collection hold
        i.e. only owning library + global registrant can write SingleItem

See also
libris/definitions#494

Later on Item might be replaced by ItemHolding for the holding, with SingleItem and SomeItem for 1 vs many items.
See libris/definitions#483
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants