-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 963
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(yamux): increase max number of buffered inbound streams to 256 #3872
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure I follow the reasoning above. At the point where a new stream is retrieved through
this.poll_inner
, the stream will be acknowledged to the remote, thus allowing the remote to open another new stream.As far as I can tell, bumping this limit just delays running into the limit itself, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for questioning this!
I don't think this is true. We emit streams in
rust-yamux
without acknowledging them directly because we don't want to send a frame for just acknowledging a stream. I'll have to dig into this in detail but I think we delay the acknowledgement until we send the first payload on this stream.The first payload will be
multistream-select
which in our case happens directly after we have removed a stream from this buffer. Meaning if ourConnection
is slow in removing streams from this buffer, the remote should eventually stop opening new streams.I think it makes sense to write a test against this just to be sure but for that we land the ACK backlog changes first: libp2p/rust-yamux#150
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the
WindowUpdateMode
is set toOnRead
(which is the default), then we are not sending aFrame
on a newly opened inbound stream until the user first uses it. To acknowledge the stream in that case, we preemptively set theACK
flag:https://github.com/libp2p/rust-yamux/blob/72ccd5734f71971fc1f02ac4a5f43b8eb4dff660/yamux/src/connection.rs#L656
Let me know if you see anything wrong with the reasoning here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I realized I still had a fully-working branch for the ACK backlog locally so I just quickly added a test for this as well and it confirmed my intuition: libp2p/rust-yamux#153