-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 228
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Increased ProviderAddrTTL from RFM17.1 isn't applied #868
Comments
This is how it worked initially: 3b37c43 for _, pi := range pinfos {
if pi.ID != p {
// we should ignore this provider reccord! not from originator.
// (we chould sign them and check signature later...)
log.Errorf("handleAddProvider received provider %s from %s. Ignore.", pi.ID, p)
continue
}
if len(pi.Addrs) < 1 {
log.Errorf("got no valid addresses for provider %s. Ignore.", p)
continue
}
log.Infof("received provider %s for %s (addrs: %s)", p, key, pi.Addrs)
for _, maddr := range pi.Addrs {
// add the received addresses to our peerstore.
dht.peerstore.AddAddress(p, maddr)
}
dht.providers.AddProvider(key, p)
} That's where it capsized: 7724838 |
cortze
pushed a commit
to cortze/go-libp2p-kad-dht
that referenced
this issue
Jul 30, 2024
added tests for addrfilter fix: don't add unresponsive DHT servers to the Routing Table (libp2p#820) * added check to avoid adding unresponsive dht peers to the dht routing table * removed lock in adding peers to the rt * made variable names more meaningful * fixed network loop and corrected tests * added UsefulPeer() references from current PR * go mod tidy * added delay in TestRefreshBelowMinRTThreshold * addressed review * go mod tidy * addressed Jorropo review * added comments * removed state of peers probed recently * fix conflicts merge * updated deps * added optimizations documentation * Update dht.go * updated md files --------- Co-authored-by: Jorropo <[email protected]> fix: don't add unresponsive DHT servers to the Routing Table (libp2p#820) * added check to avoid adding unresponsive dht peers to the dht routing table * removed lock in adding peers to the rt * made variable names more meaningful * fixed network loop and corrected tests * added UsefulPeer() references from current PR * go mod tidy * added delay in TestRefreshBelowMinRTThreshold * addressed review * go mod tidy * addressed Jorropo review * added comments * removed state of peers probed recently * fix conflicts merge * updated deps * added optimizations documentation * Update dht.go * updated md files --------- Co-authored-by: Jorropo <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 8c9fdff) chore: release v0.24.0 chore: Update .github/workflows/stale.yml [skip ci] fix: leaking go routines fix: bump kbucket for abba bug refactor: remove goprocess fix: decrease tests noise, update kbucket and fix fixRTIUfNeeded chore: release v0.24.1 chore: update go-libp2p to a non deadlocky version chore: release v0.24.2 chore: Update .github/workflows/stale.yml [skip ci] tracing: fix DHT keys as string attribute not being valid utf-8 chore: release v0.24.3 fix the server mode log in handleNewMessage by changing it to debug chore: delete templates [skip ci] (libp2p#861) ci: uci/copy-templates (libp2p#862) * chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-test.yml * chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-check.yml * chore: add or force update .github/workflows/releaser.yml * chore: add or force update .github/workflows/release-check.yml * chore: add or force update .github/workflows/tagpush.yml chore: bump go.mod to Go 1.20 and run go fix chore: bump go-libp2p and/or quic-go to latest version tracing: add protocol messages client tracing chore: release v0.25.0 add provider record addresses to peerstore fixes issue libp2p#868 fixing base32 import fix: apply addrFilters in the dht (libp2p#872) * fix: correctly apply addrFilters in the dht This still does not do the fullrt client but it wasn't doing it before either. * Add address filter tests * use channel instead of waitgroup to catch timeouts * filter multiaddresses when serving provider records --------- Co-authored-by: Dennis Trautwein <[email protected]> fix: properly iterate in tracing for protocol messenger MB Copy Paste Typo, This caused panics while tracing. chore: use go-libp2p-routing-helpers for tracing needs go-libp2p-routing-helpers has an optimized implementation that does nothing if we are not tracing, it also properly log all IO of the request. perf: don't buffer the output of FindProvidersAsync We always select it against ctx and we don't rely on the fact it will always be non blocking since when count is zero we can't realistically preallocate. Buffering use more memory makes more garbage and is less efficient than direct copies. chore: release v0.25.1 add ctx canceled err check return canceled err not retry reset stream and return err when ctx canceled release v0.25.2 chore: Update .github/workflows/stale.yml [skip ci] chore: bump go.mod to Go 1.21 and run go fix chore: run go mod tidy chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-test.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/releaser.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/release-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/tagpush.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-test.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/releaser.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/release-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/tagpush.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-test.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/go-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/releaser.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/release-check.yml chore: add or force update .github/workflows/tagpush.yml findnode(self) now returns multiple peers don't lookup check if not enough peers in table enhanced tests moved rt size check after request Upgrade to go-log v2.5.1
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Looking through the code, I believe that the increased
ProviderAddrTTL
doesn’t have any effect. We increased that value as a result of RFM 17.1.In this line we pass the new provider of a certain key to the
ProviderManager
:The value that we're passing is just
peer.AddrInfo{ID: p}
, so there are no addresses attached to it. In theProviderManger
this value gets handledhere
:provInfo
is thepeer.AddrInfo{ID: p}
from above. This means theAddrs
field will be always empty, so, I believe,ProviderAddrTTL
won't have any effect.However, we're still keeping the addresses around for a bit because the peer that stores the records with us gets added to the peerstore just because it connected to us - the TTL of their addresses will just be different. I think the values are
ConnectedAddrTTL
while we're connected to that peer (basically infinite TTL) andTempAddrTTL
after we have disconnected. The latter value is set to 2 minutes.cc @cortze
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: