post: rust-libp2p webrtc in the browser #117
Conversation
DougAnderson444
changed the title
|
Feedback /additions / suggestions are welcome. As I am writing this, I'm realizing that the real news here is that rust-libp2p is running in the browser over WebRTC, so I'm making the distinction between server vs browser a lot. The repo has an example, so I'm torn whether to include any code examples there or just point people to the repo / docs. I'm leaning towards pointing, as rust docs are kept up to date through doctest so it'll always be more up to date whereas a blog entry will eventually fall out of date. So keeping more towards a news announcement? |
Sounds good to me! I'll hold off on a more detailed review for now to reduce the churn :) |
|
Thanks for touching base gentlemen! Yes it's a really rough draft right now but wanted to get a feel for your thoughts on the content. I'll have another look after libp2p day at Lab Week |
Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
rm `the` typo Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
rm typo Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Max Inden <[email protected]>
I moved some paras around to make more sense, I capitalized Rust everywhere and made sme other small changes. Have a read!
|
Had another look at this today and made some changes. It is looking good and I think the right emphasis is starting to emerge. |
|
@DougAnderson444 ping us once you would like another review. Thank you for your work! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome work @DougAnderson444 ! I've left a few comments but overall looks good to me :)
It might be more beneficial to release this post than to keep editing it for perfection... if the reviewer likes the post, I recommend posting it. DA.
|
|
?
Draft pull request for the blog post referenced in #113