Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invert RequireCommonName into AllowNoCommonName #7139

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023
Merged

Invert RequireCommonName into AllowNoCommonName #7139

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

aarongable
Copy link
Contributor

The RequireCommonName feature flag was our only "inverted" feature flag, which defaulted to true and had to be explicitly set to false. This inversion can lead to confusion, especially to readers who expect all Go default values to be zero values. We plan to remove the ability for our feature flag system to support default-true flags, which the existence of this flag blocked. Since this flag has not been set in any real configs, inverting it is easy.

Part of #6802

@aarongable aarongable requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2023 18:36
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2023

@aarongable, this PR appears to contain configuration changes. Please ensure that a corresponding deployment ticket has been filed with the new configuration values.

@beautifulentropy beautifulentropy requested a review from a team November 6, 2023 18:49
@jsha jsha merged commit 16081d8 into main Nov 6, 2023
20 checks passed
@jsha jsha deleted the invert-rcn branch November 6, 2023 18:58
@aarongable
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please ensure that a corresponding deployment ticket has been filed with the new configuration values.

IN-9772 tracks enabling this feature flag.

@mcpherrinm
Copy link
Contributor

https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/simplifying-issuance-for-very-long-domain-names/207924

I’ve publicly announced that I intend to set this feature flag on this Wednesday in staging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants