Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: lake: more robust trace reading #4518

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2024

Conversation

tydeu
Copy link
Member

@tydeu tydeu commented Jun 20, 2024

The recent change of the trace format exposed some unexpected issues with Lake's tracing handling. This aims to fix that.

Lake will now perform a rebuild if the trace file is invalid/unreadable. However, it will still fall back to modification times if the trace file is missing. Also, Lake is now backwards compatible with the previous pure numeric traces (and tolerates the absence of a log field in the JSON trace).

@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Jun 20, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label Jun 20, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Mathlib CI status (docs):

@tydeu tydeu force-pushed the lake/robust-read-trace branch from e1b4279 to 0cf897b Compare June 21, 2024 00:01
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
@tydeu tydeu added the will-merge-soon …unless someone speaks up label Jun 21, 2024
@digama0
Copy link
Collaborator

digama0 commented Jun 21, 2024

@semorrison FYI, this is (IMO) high prio to get into 4.9.0, it fixes a backward compatibility issue which currently afflicts people updating to 4.9.0-rcX from 4.8.0.

@tydeu tydeu added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 21, 2024
Merged via the queue into leanprover:master with commit f32780d Jun 21, 2024
17 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
The recent change of the trace format exposed some unexpected issues
with Lake's tracing handling. This aims to fix that.

Lake will now perform a rebuild if the trace file is invalid/unreadable.
However, it will still fall back to modification times if the trace file
is missing. Also, Lake is now backwards compatible with the previous
pure numeric traces (and tolerates the absence of a `log` field in the
JSON trace).

(cherry picked from commit f32780d)
@tydeu tydeu deleted the lake/robust-read-trace branch June 21, 2024 02:06
tydeu added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2024
The recent change of the trace format exposed some unexpected issues
with Lake's tracing handling. This aims to fix that.

Lake will now perform a rebuild if the trace file is invalid/unreadable.
However, it will still fall back to modification times if the trace file
is missing. Also, Lake is now backwards compatible with the previous
pure numeric traces (and tolerates the absence of a `log` field in the
JSON trace).

(cherry picked from commit f32780d)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport releases/v4.9.0 builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN will-merge-soon …unless someone speaks up
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants