Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: missing withSynthesize in #check_tactic #4489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged

chore: missing withSynthesize in #check_tactic #4489

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

kim-em
Copy link
Collaborator

@kim-em kim-em commented Jun 18, 2024 •
edited by nomeata
Loading

Ran into this writing #check_simp tests for List. I guess it wasn't a problem for Bool / Prop.

@kim-em kim-em enabled auto-merge June 18, 2024 05:13
@github-actions github-actions bot temporarily deployed to lean-lang.org/lean4/doc June 18, 2024 05:20 Inactive
@kim-em kim-em added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Jun 18, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 97588301e16a00b287f75936bf7529332218a973 --onto 1cf71e54cf268e87cf5c43c830d953f5c88e6c39. (2024-06-18 05:27:20)

Merged via the queue into master with commit 2995e74 Jun 18, 2024
14 checks passed
@kim-em kim-em deleted the withSynthesize_in_check_tactic branch June 18, 2024 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kim-em @leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot