Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add check 102 to detect SY-SYSID usage #1124

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Add check 102 to detect SY-SYSID usage #1124

merged 10 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

ConjuringCoffee
Copy link
Collaborator

This new check finds logic utilizing the value from SY-SYSID.

I'm currently preparing for a system migration, so the name of the system will be different from before. I want to use this check to fix potential errors where logic is coupled to a specific system name.

@ConjuringCoffee ConjuringCoffee marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2024 11:46
@ConjuringCoffee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'm not sure how to proceed with RFC enablement: Would I just call enable_rfc( ) in the constructor and that's it? I have no idea what the limitations are.

@larshp
Copy link
Owner

larshp commented Jan 5, 2024

I'm not sure how to proceed with RFC enablement: Would I just call enable_rfc( ) in the constructor and that's it? I have no idea what the limitations are.

yes, for this scenario

RFC works well when its just the statements and tokens that are used

Copy link
Owner

@larshp larshp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good to me, ship it :)

@larshp larshp merged commit 67e6abc into larshp:main Jan 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@ConjuringCoffee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the quick responses 🎉

@larshp
Copy link
Owner

larshp commented Jan 5, 2024

@ConjuringCoffee you should have access to create branches in this repository now

commit early and often, open a PR as draft, to get early feedback from the linter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants