[11.x] Support attributes in app()->call()

[innocenzi]

This pull request is a follow-up of #51934. It adds support for the same features on app()->call(), therefore supporting parameters injected to routes, handle methods, etc.

Important note

Since the resolution of the dependencies of closures happens outside of the container itself (in BoundMethod), we don't have access to methods that are needed for this to work.

Specifically:

• resolveFromAttribute
• fireAfterResolvingAttributeCallbacks

These cannot be copied to BoundMethod because they depend on properties of the container (contextualAttributes and afterResolvingAttributeCallbacks).

I couldn't find a clean solution for this that didn't involve a bigger refactor. For now, I made these methods public, but the pull request cannot be merged as-is, as we do not want them to be available to the public API.

Possible solutions

• I thought of refactoring BoundMethod#addDependencyForCallParameter to use Container#resolveDependencies, but it doesn't support the $parameters array and its behavior is slightly different.
• BoundMethod could be integrated into the Container itself (but we can't get rid of the class entirely, it is not marked as @internal, projects like Livewire use it).
• We could invade methods of the container, but this is slow and hacky.

Any suggestion?

[github-actions]

Thanks for submitting a PR!

Note that draft PR's are not reviewed. If you would like a review, please mark your pull request as ready for review in the GitHub user interface.

Pull requests that are abandoned in draft may be closed due to inactivity.

[taylorotwell]

@innocenzi it looks like one area we may still be missing is routes. Those dependencies are resolved via the ResolvesRouteDependencies trait. 😵‍💫 So right now container attributes don't work on dependencies type-hinted on a closure route or I assume controller either.

[innocenzi]

I'll look into that as well then 👍

[innocenzi]

@taylorotwell I added support and tests for that, but the implementation suffers from the same issues as BoundMethod I'm afraid

[taylorotwell]

@innocenzi thanks!