[docs]: update Redis (langchain-redis) documentation notebooks (vectorstore, llm caching, chat message history)

[bsbodden]

• Description: Adds notebooks for Redis Partner Package (langchain-redis)
• Issue: N/A
• Dependencies: None
• Twitter handle: @bsbodden and @redis

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
langchain	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Aug 22, 2024 3:50pm

[ccurme]

Looks good, thanks for doing this. Some comments / questions:

• We recently introduced an effort to standardize our integration docs, including vector store docs. See issue here: Standardize vector store docs #24800. This PR recently standardized the redis vector store doc. We are un-doing some of that here.
• If possible we should update the existing caching doc instead of writing a new one for Redis.
• The changes to the vector store doc in particular remove what I'd consider useful sections (e.g., overview of deployment options, deploying via Docker, etc.). I'm wondering what is the motivation for deleting them. Left some comments in-line.

[bsbodden]

@ccurme some answers...

Looks good, thanks for doing this. Some comments / questions:

• We recently introduced an effort to standardize our integration docs, including vector store docs. See issue here: Standardize vector store docs #24800. This PR recently standardized the redis vector store doc. We are un-doing some of that here.

Sure, I'll check it the PR and adjust

• If possible we should update the existing caching doc instead of writing a new one for Redis.

Speaking with @efriis about the caching page... We have enough caches that there should be individual pages. For now create a caches folder with just redis (I’ll deal with the rest)

• The changes to the vector store doc in particular remove what I'd consider useful sections (e.g., overview of deployment options, deploying via Docker, etc.). I'm wondering what is the motivation for deleting them. Left some comments in-line.

I particularly felt there was too much ceremony before getting to the usage of the library, but I can bring some of that back.

[bsbodden]

Looks good, thanks for doing this. Some comments / questions:

• We recently introduced an effort to standardize our integration docs, including vector store docs. See issue here: Standardize vector store docs #24800. This PR recently standardized the redis vector store doc. We are un-doing some of that here.
• If possible we should update the existing caching doc instead of writing a new one for Redis.
• The changes to the vector store doc in particular remove what I'd consider useful sections (e.g., overview of deployment options, deploying via Docker, etc.). I'm wondering what is the motivation for deleting them. Left some comments in-line.

Looked at all the associated issues with standardizing the vectorstores docs, and modified the redis notebook to follow the guidelines. Another PR for the langchain-redis project with updated DocStrings will follow. Cheers.

[tylerhutcherson]

LGTM from a Reids standpoint -- thanks @bsbodden !