🐛 Fix very long runtimes for Artifact.describe #2273
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2273 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.71% 92.84% +0.12%
==========================================
Files 55 55
Lines 6947 7196 +249
==========================================
+ Hits 6441 6681 +240
- Misses 506 515 +9 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@Koncopd does this also improve the memory usage? Can I try it again now? |
|
I hope so, but i haven't checked. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Identified a few bottlenecks with a profiler and fixed them.
Now
runs around 10 sec each instead of several minutes.
Fixed describe when artifact is queried with
using.ln.Artifact.using("laminlabs/cellxgene").get("g0RcSSYe5vQKzSWYkhMc").describe()was failing before.4-10 sec depending on annotations still feels pretty slow though, so it is probably not the final iteration.
Addresses:
describe()#2268