🐛 Better error behavior for repeated calls of standardize

[Zethson]

Fixes #2262

Fixes KeyError formatting

Before

KeyError: '\"cell_line\" is not a valid key, available keys are: \\'well\\', \\'sirna\\'!'"

After

KeyError: "'cell_line' is not a valid key, available keys are: 'well', 'sirna'!"

Fixes repeated calls of standardize()

curator.standardize("disease")
curator.standardize("disease")

Before

led to a traceback with 'KeyError: 'disease' is not a valid key.

After

• No unstandardized values found for 'disease'

Now hides the add_new_from_columns method from sphinx

Before this PR, the deprecated add_new_from_columns method was still listed in our documentation. It is now hidden.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.05882% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.89%. Comparing base (4c27162) to head (8e0c5f7).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lamindb/_curate.py	94.73%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2266      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.71%   92.89%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines        6947     7177     +230     
==========================================
+ Hits         6441     6667     +226     
- Misses        506      510       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed on https://67570b9c904273089a82c61d--lamindb-qnwk.netlify.app

[falexwolf]

Ahh, main is broken because of the wetlab upgrade:

• ✏️ Fix typos in describe sections #2271

I guess I'll wait with the above until this here is merged.

[falexwolf]

The summary content is great! But due to inconsistent indendation levels, it's is hard to read through (I was confused by what "1." is and where "2." is etc.) -- can you please use headings or any other consistent way of styling things?

[falexwolf]

Done:

[falexwolf]

😆 -- edited at the same time!

Can now do A/B testing.

A	B

[Zethson]

If you still have your source, we can go for B. It's less overwhelming and I like numbered changes. Easier to refer to.

[falexwolf]

If you still have your source, we can go for B. It's less overwhelming and I like numbered changes. Easier to refer to.

Yeah, it's in the version drop down:

I just fixed the indenting but left everything else you had the same.