Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header #33

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 23, 2020

Conversation

xmorave2
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
New Feature yes

Description

Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header could be useful when experimenting with policies without impact of you application.

@demiankatz
Copy link

Just adding a comment in support of merging this; looks like a safe change to me.

In case anyone is concerned about the failing test, this looks to be the same failure that is affecting master (and which is apparently addressed by #31). It might be a good idea for @xmorave2 to merge the latest master into this PR, though, in case it clarifies the Travis failure messages (since right now, what I'm seeing here looks a little different from what I'm seeing in master).

@samsonasik
Copy link
Member

please rebase against latest develop branch

@xmorave2
Copy link
Contributor Author

please rebase against latest develop branch

thanks @samsonasik

now I use branch develop and I also add sign-off line to my commit

@xmorave2
Copy link
Contributor Author

xmorave2 commented Jun 2, 2020

Is there something what could I do to have this merged? Thanks

@weierophinney weierophinney added this to the 2.12.0 milestone Jun 23, 2020
weierophinney added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 23, 2020
- Adds CHANGELOG entry for #33
- Sets release date in CHANGELOG for 2.12.0
- Updates branch-aliases:
  - dev-master => 2.12.x-dev
  - dev-develop => 2.13.x-dev

Signed-off-by: Matthew Weier O'Phinney <[email protected]>
@weierophinney weierophinney merged commit 66d41de into laminas:develop Jun 23, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants