Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix spelling of "beggining" throughout. #512

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 9, 2023
Merged

Conversation

craigbox
Copy link
Contributor

@craigbox craigbox commented Oct 2, 2023

PR Type:

Refactoring


PR Description:

This PR corrects the spelling of the word "beginning" throughout the codebase. The misspelled word "beggining" has been replaced with "beginning" in multiple files. This change improves the readability and maintainability of the code.


PR Main Files Walkthrough:

files:

rules/CVE-2022-0492/raw.rego: The misspelled word "beggining" has been replaced with "beginning" in multiple places.
rules/non-root-containers/raw.rego: The misspelled word "beggining" has been replaced with "beginning" in multiple places.


User Description:

Replaces PR #323 with a version that will test properly and is up-to-date.

Signed-off-by: Craig Box [email protected]

@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Oct 2, 2023

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Refactoring code to correct spelling errors
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR corrects the spelling of the word "beginning" throughout the codebase. The misspelled word "beggining" has been replaced with "start" in multiple files. This change improves the readability and maintainability of the code.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 1
    The PR is straightforward and involves only renaming of a variable. It should be quick to review.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well done and the changes are straightforward. It is always good to correct spelling errors as they can cause confusion and decrease code readability. The changes made in this PR improve the readability and maintainability of the code.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2023

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@yuleib yuleib merged commit 2dc0c6c into master Oct 9, 2023
26 checks passed
@yuleib yuleib deleted the poor-old-michael-finnegan branch October 9, 2023 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants