Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updated service page #43548
updated service page #43548
Changes from all commits
f7aed09
a15edee
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Line 38 is optional change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @aj11anuj
Thanks for the review. I included
to clarify potential reasons behind the behavior for improved user understanding. If you believe it's optional, I'm open to your suggestion and can adjust if needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just adding these factors won't really reduce ambiguity
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hi @Gauravpadam ,
Thank you for your feedback and your offer to assist.
I agree with your feedback that Just adding these factors won't make a huge difference in clarity.
I added these factors just to guide the readers so that they could explore the factors in detail, as the resources can be easily found within the Kubernetes documentation.
However, regarding this
I intentionally didn't include more info to maintain a clear and focused message.
Providing extensive details might shift the text's primary focus away (from the dynamic nature of Kubernetes and its challenges in maintaining connectivity), potentially making it less effective in conveying the main point.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Gauravpadam
However, your suggestion is highly valued and I am eager to look at your suggestions to replace these factors in a clearer way which is also concise enough to not shift the focus of the reader from the primary message of the documentation text.
Thanks again for taking the time to look into this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/pod-lifecycle/ is a good place to refer