Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

kubeadm-ts: add entry about patching kube-proxy in CCM scenarios #13033

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2019
Merged

kubeadm-ts: add entry about patching kube-proxy in CCM scenarios #13033

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2019

Conversation

neolit123
Copy link
Member

This patch adds a entry in the kubeadm troubleshooting guide
about a problem that was found some time ago related to
kube-proxy DaemonSets and worker nodes in a CP setup.

xref kubernetes/kubeadm#1027

@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/kind bug
/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 8, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language labels Mar 8, 2019
@neolit123 neolit123 mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2019
Closed
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 8, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Deploy preview for kubernetes-io-master-staging ready!

Built with commit e00ae85

https://deploy-preview-13033--kubernetes-io-master-staging.netlify.com

@neolit123 neolit123 force-pushed the kubeadm-ts-kube-proxy-cp branch from d50711d to cc038fa Compare March 8, 2019 03:35
@neolit123
kubeadm-ts: add entry about patching kube-proxy in CCM scenarios
e00ae85 
This patch adds a entry in the kubeadm troubleshooting guide
about a problem that was found some time ago related to
kube-proxy DaemonSets and worker nodes in a CP setup.
@neolit123 neolit123 force-pushed the kubeadm-ts-kube-proxy-cp branch from cc038fa to e00ae85 Compare March 13, 2019 00:06
@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @kbarnard10 @Rajakavitha1

@neolit123
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @jimangel @cody-clark

@DanyC97
Copy link
Contributor

DanyC97 commented Mar 22, 2019

thank you for the PR @neolit123 .

according to our PR wrangler rotation - documented here @jaredbhatti is on the rotta and he should be able to help.

/unassign @jimangel @cody-clark
/assign @jaredbhatti

@DanyC97
Copy link
Contributor

DanyC97 commented Mar 22, 2019

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 22, 2019
@kbarnard10
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kbarnard10

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 26, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 6c41db7 into kubernetes:master Mar 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@seh seh seh left review comments

@NeilW NeilW NeilW left review comments

@Rajakavitha1 Rajakavitha1 Awaiting requested review from Rajakavitha1

@zhangxiaoyu-zidif zhangxiaoyu-zidif Awaiting requested review from zhangxiaoyu-zidif

Assignees

@jaredbhatti jaredbhatti

@DanyC97 DanyC97

@kbarnard10 kbarnard10

@Rajakavitha1 Rajakavitha1

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. language/en Issues or PRs related to English language lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
10 participants
@neolit123 @DanyC97 @kbarnard10 @k8s-ci-robot @NeilW @seh @jimangel @jaredbhatti @cody-clark @Rajakavitha1