Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testgrid should show the new build SHA in upgrade test #3392

Closed
caesarxuchao opened this issue Jul 7, 2017 · 37 comments
Closed

testgrid should show the new build SHA in upgrade test #3392

caesarxuchao opened this issue Jul 7, 2017 · 37 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject area/testgrid help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@caesarxuchao
Copy link
Member

e.g., https://k8s-testgrid.appspot.com/1.6-1.7-upgrade

The UI shows the SHA of the old image. It's more useful if the UI instead shows the SHA of the image the cluster is upgraded to, because that's what the release team cares about.

cc @krzyzacy @ixdy

@ixdy
Copy link
Member

ixdy commented Jul 7, 2017

FWIW Gubernator used to show both versions in the metadata at the top, but in some of the job config and test-infra refactoring, it seems like this functionality was lost.

@fejta
Copy link
Contributor

fejta commented Jul 7, 2017

Update this method to include both versions in the metadata.json, which will result in it getting exposed to both gubernator and testgrid
https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/kubetest/main.go#L345

@fejta fejta closed this as completed Sep 30, 2017
@fejta fejta reopened this Sep 30, 2017
@fejta fejta added the help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. label Sep 30, 2017
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Oct 20, 2017

/area kubetest
per the above comment

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Oct 20, 2017

@fejta which method, writeMetadata()?

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

Prevent issues from auto-closing with an /lifecycle frozen comment.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or @fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 18, 2018
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jan 18, 2018

/remove-lifecycle stale
this remains a pain point for consumers of testgrid during release

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 18, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 18, 2018
@krzyzacy
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 18, 2018
@fejta fejta removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Jun 20, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 18, 2018
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Sep 19, 2018

/remove-lifecycle stale
/assign
I wrote a doc about figuring upgrade versions, it would be way nicer to make that doc smaller and say "just look at gubernator"

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 19, 2018
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 18, 2018
@ixdy
Copy link
Member

ixdy commented Dec 18, 2018

/pony sad

someday someone will work on this.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ixdy: pony image

In response to this:

/pony sad

someday someone will work on this.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject labels Jul 29, 2019
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle rotten
/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. labels Jul 29, 2019
@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Jul 29, 2019

@justaugustus i can try this one if i get some initial guide, like where to start :)

@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

Thanks Carlos! I personally just found this issue.

@spiffxp @fejta -- Can you provide some details on current state of affairs and what Carlos would need to work on this?

/assign @cpanato

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jul 29, 2019

This was primarily in reference to all of the jobs that now live here: https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-release-orphaned

They are run via kubetest: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/kubetest#upgrade-skew-kubemark

Testgrid columns are defined in testgrid config.yaml like so: https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/testgrid/config.md#column-headers

So the questions I can't answer off the top of my head and leave to you are:

  • how can you identify the versions being upgraded (is it version files, is it api calls)
  • where can you do this (is it a change in kubetest, is it a change in something kubetest kicks off)
  • where can you store this data such that it ends up in the metadata section of finished.json (this one could probably use a docs PR when you find the answer)

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Aug 4, 2019

@spiffxp Thanks Aaron, since I'm quite new to the codebase I will ping you at slack to talk more, of course, if you agree on that :)

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

until the rest is agreed there's nothing to do in kubetest, this metadata can just as easily come from the (rather broken) upgrade system.

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Sep 11, 2020

/remove-lifecycle frozen
/assign @BenTheElder
putting this on your radar

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Sep 11, 2020
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Sep 11, 2020

/remove-priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Sep 11, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 10, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 9, 2021
@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Jan 26, 2021

this is something we still want to do?
@BenTheElder @spiffxp

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

IMHO both versions are under test and I think it's debateable which is primary.
I think both versions should be inspected if we're looking at either of them.
@amwat is mostly maintaining kubetest now, in bug-fix mode while we roll out kubetest2.

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jan 28, 2021

I don't have bandwidth for this, if nobody else does I guess we can let it age out.

This sort of thing remains something the release-team has the power to change if they want, see https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/blob/master/testgrid/config.md#column-headers for how to specify what data should appear in what column

It just requires the time to figure out how to get the versions you want, and to make sure they end up in metadata.json (or finished.json's metadata object)

@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Jan 28, 2021

I opened #20650 for another testgrid columne hygiene thing I think the community could help with

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

brian-avery pushed a commit to brian-avery/kube-test-infra that referenced this issue Jul 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject area/testgrid help wanted Denotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants