You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It has been de-facto Steering Committee policy for the last 2+ years that nobody can be on both the CoCC and the SC at the same time. However, this isn't documented in either the SC or the CoCC election materials, rules, or bylaws. As a result, this month we have someone who is running for both offices. Because, why shouldn't they?
Proposed Solution
Both the CoCC and the SC candidate materials should clearly spell out that you can't be on both bodies at once.
Cost
N/A
Open Questions
Can someone run for both, and only accept one? If so, under what circumstances?
Next Steps
Steering to write final CoCC/SC conflict policy
Steering to direct CoCC and Elections subproj to add that to documentation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Problem Statement
It has been de-facto Steering Committee policy for the last 2+ years that nobody can be on both the CoCC and the SC at the same time. However, this isn't documented in either the SC or the CoCC election materials, rules, or bylaws. As a result, this month we have someone who is running for both offices. Because, why shouldn't they?
Proposed Solution
Both the CoCC and the SC candidate materials should clearly spell out that you can't be on both bodies at once.
Cost
N/A
Open Questions
Can someone run for both, and only accept one? If so, under what circumstances?
Next Steps
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: