Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document rule around CoCC and SC #271

Closed
2 tasks
jberkus opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
2 tasks

Document rule around CoCC and SC #271

jberkus opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@jberkus
Copy link
Contributor

jberkus commented Aug 15, 2023

Problem Statement

It has been de-facto Steering Committee policy for the last 2+ years that nobody can be on both the CoCC and the SC at the same time. However, this isn't documented in either the SC or the CoCC election materials, rules, or bylaws. As a result, this month we have someone who is running for both offices. Because, why shouldn't they?

Proposed Solution

Both the CoCC and the SC candidate materials should clearly spell out that you can't be on both bodies at once.

Cost

N/A

Open Questions

Can someone run for both, and only accept one? If so, under what circumstances?

Next Steps

  • Steering to write final CoCC/SC conflict policy
  • Steering to direct CoCC and Elections subproj to add that to documentation
@justaugustus
Copy link
Member

Closing as duplicate of #221.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@justaugustus: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Closing as duplicate of #221.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants