-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 397
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update release notes draft to version v1.31.0-alpha.2 #2542
Update release notes draft to version v1.31.0-alpha.2 #2542
Conversation
text: 'DRA: client-side validation of a ResourceHandle would have accepted a missing | ||
DriverName, whereas server-side validation then would have raised an error.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this explaining a bug fix?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What does DRA stand for? Dynamic Resource Allocation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, this is a bug fix. Maybe we can add "fix" and define DRA here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added the full form
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ | |||
pr: 124131 | |||
releasenote: | |||
text: Endpointslices mirrored from Endpoints by the EndpointSliceMirroring controller |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a bug fix? if so, how about changing it to:
Fixed the bug where if Endpointslices mirrored from Endpoints by the EndpointSliceMirroring controller they would not reconcile if modified.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, let's do it.
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
pr: 123668 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's so strange... the PR is actually kubernetes/kubernetes#123669
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how can this be possible?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Anyway I am editing it to 123669 as of now
9b4e17f
to
e38eb10
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: satyampsoni The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind documentation
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR updates the Release Notes Draft to k/k v1.31.0-alpha.2
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is an automated PR generated from
krel The Kubernetes Release Toolbox