-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Migrate bootkube to kubernetes-sigs #1305
Comments
@aaronlevy Thanks for creating an issue to get this moving! Regarding approval, we'll still need at least one lgtm from a SIG lead since this involves moving repos (albeit, in the kubernetes orgs). /assign @timothysc @justinsb |
@aaronlevy - How active is the project now-a-days? I was looking through the commit logs and if the most prevalent users are openshift, is there any other major consumers? |
Yes, In Razorpay, We are using bootkube. |
Also the Talos Systems folks have been maintaining a fork, but would like to contribute back to the upstream project. I haven't personally been able to spend much time on the project, but there has been interest from community members to pick up this effort / become maintainers. That's part of the reason for this move (can't add new people to incubator projects). |
part of any project that would be submitted would be to evaluate the owners files and aliases to determine the health of the proposed sub-project. Could you please update https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/bootkube/blob/master/OWNERS to reflect who the new owners are? If projects are not actively maintained then move them out of community resources. Also SIG chairs will need rights in order to manage the repo should it fall into disarray. Please update your OWNERS and OWNERS_ALIAS to reflect who are the maintainers (e.g. - https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api/blob/master/OWNERS_ALIASES) |
Opened kubernetes-retired/bootkube#1051 and kubernetes-retired/bootkube#1052 to address this. Bit of a chicken-egg problem on kubernetes-retired/bootkube#1051 - @rmenn isn't part of the org, but people aren't being added to incubator org anymore... I could start by just adding @andrewrynhard for the sake of the project move - but will wait to hear your thoughts. |
@rmenn @andrewrynhard - if you can confirm that would be useful. |
@timothysc Yes please. We have a lot of updates to bootkube we would love to get in before the 1.17 k8s release. The sooner we can start, the better. |
@timothysc nope i am not a member of kubernetes-incubator, please feel free to add @andrewrynhard |
@rmenn you will need todo a korg issue/request for access to the kubernetes-sigs org. |
will do, i did open this up, which is when this (#1282) pebble started rolling down the hill, will open once once everything is migrated |
opened #1343 TBD after migration |
We are using it in https://github.com/kinvolk/lokomotive-kubernetes too. We've just opened some PRs too :-) |
Poke me when the OWNER file is finalized and folks have access to the org. |
@timothysc The OWNERS and OWNERS_ALIASES have been updated. |
/assign I'll move things over once theres ack from @timothysc 👍 |
@rmenn & @andrewrynhard - can you please apply for membership of kubernetes-sigs org once that is done then it we're good. /lgtm |
See #1357 for my Kubernetes-sigs membership request. |
@timothysc both of us are a part of the org, |
/hold cancel |
SECURITY_CONTACTS updated with repo migration. For more information see: kubernetes/org#1305
Once all remaining PRs are merged, the repo migration will be complete. |
All PRs have been merged. The repo has been migrated. I'm going to go ahead and close the issue. If you have any problems or questions, please feel free to reopen or ping me on slack :) /close |
@mrbobbytables: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
New Repo, Staging Repo, or migrate existing
migrate existing
Requested name for new repository
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/bootkube
Which Organization should it reside
kubernetes-sigs
If not a staging repo, who should have admin access
@aaronlevy
If not a staging repo, who should have write access
@aaronlevy
If not a staging repo, who should be listed as approvers in OWNERS
@aaronlevy
If not a staging repo, who should be listed in SECURITY_CONTACTS
@aaronlevy
What should the repo description be
Launch a self-hosted Kubernetes cluster
What SIG and subproject does this fall under in sigs.yaml
This is a new subproject for sig-cluster-lifecycle called bootkube
Approvals
I believe this is already technically part of sig-cluster-lifecycle (https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/sig-cluster-lifecycle#bootkube), but the repo was never moved.
/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle
Additional context for request
Moving from deprecated kubernetes-incubator org.
Intention is to add community (and active SIG members) to OWNERS once this is moved. /cc @andrewrynhard @rmenn
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: