Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Ginkgo to support building on riscv64 arch #86013

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2019
Merged

Bump Ginkgo to support building on riscv64 arch #86013

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 20, 2019

Conversation

carlosedp
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Bump Ginkgo to allow building on Risc-V architecture.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Change on Ginkgo merged on PR onsi/ginkgo#632.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @carlosedp. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Dec 6, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from apelisse, cheftako and a team December 6, 2019 21:04
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/apiserver area/cloudprovider area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes area/kubectl sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 6, 2019

### Fixes
- speed up table entry generateIt() (#609) [5049dc5]
- Fix. Write errors to stderr instead of stdout (#610) [7bb3091]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hopefully this doesn't cause us any issues :-)

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 6, 2019
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/assign @liggitt

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 6, 2019
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test
/test pull-kubernetes-typecheck
[hijacking this PR which is otherwise blocked to test the updated job definition]

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 6, 2019
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. label Dec 10, 2019
@carlosedp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bumped to latest numbered release.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Dec 19, 2019
@carlosedp
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Dec 20, 2019

/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big

updating to newer ginkgo is definitely worthwhile even if not for the riscv64 aspect :)

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Dec 20, 2019

@BenTheElder ok to remove hold?

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Dec 20, 2019

/approve
/lgtm
/priority important-longterm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, carlosedp, liggitt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 20, 2019
@carlosedp
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big

Something wonky with this test...
Ref. #82949

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 20, 2019
@carlosedp
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4ff6928 into kubernetes:master Dec 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.18 milestone Dec 20, 2019
wking pushed a commit to wking/kubernetes that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2020
Bump Ginkgo to support building on riscv64 arch

Kubernetes-commit: 4ff6928
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/apiserver area/cloudprovider area/dependency Issues or PRs related to dependency changes area/kubectl cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/cli Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG CLI. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants