kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns #66499

rosti · 2018-07-23T12:17:08Z

What this PR does / why we need it:

It appears that sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images are now required for
kube-dns deployment to work correctly. Thus the following default kube-dns
images are used now:

k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-kube-dns-amd64:1.14.10
k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-sidecar-amd64:1.14.10
k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-dnsmasq-nanny-amd64:1.14.10

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes kubernetes/kubeadm#1016

Special notes for your reviewer:

/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/area kubeadm
/assign @luxas
/assign @timothysc
/kind bug

Release note:

kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns

k8s-ci-robot · 2018-07-23T12:17:16Z

@rosti: Reiterating the mentions to trigger a notification:
@kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

It appears that sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images are now required for
kube-dns deployment to work correctly. Thus the following default kube-dns
images are used now:

k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-kube-dns-amd64:1.14.10

k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-sidecar-amd64:1.14.10

k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-dnsmasq-nanny-amd64:1.14.10

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes kubernetes/kubeadm#1016

Special notes for your reviewer:

/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/area kubeadm
/assign @luxas
/assign @timothysc
/kind bug

Release note:
kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

neolit123 · 2018-07-23T14:10:25Z

/cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews
/ok-to-test

luxas

/lgtm
/approve
/hold
Please make sure this is working with appropriate unit tests. If we don't already have tests covering all of this, write them as part of this patch.

timothysc · 2018-07-24T02:22:09Z

I'm missing something, why is this needed, and can you cross link the canonical reference from folks who manage these integrations.

/cc @MrHohn

Are you aware of this requirement, and where did it come from?

rosti · 2018-07-24T09:51:13Z

I was a bit baffled by this too, but it is true. Tried it with a clean setup in a VM with Kubernetes 1.11.1 and it indeed fetched the sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images and started them up:

# docker ps | grep dns
d1d618b961e7        k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-sidecar-amd64@sha256:4f1ab957f87b94a5ec1edc26fae50da2175461f00afecf68940c4aa079bd08a4         "/sidecar --v=2 --..."   39 minutes ago      Up 39 minutes                           k8s_sidecar_kube-dns-86c47599bd-865pw_kube-system_3cac7428-8f21-11e8-a06a-020043fe033b_0
4985e4dc39cb        k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-dnsmasq-nanny-amd64@sha256:bbb2a290a568125b3b996028958eb773f33b5b87a6b37bf38a28f8b62dddb3c8   "/dnsmasq-nanny -v..."   39 minutes ago      Up 39 minutes                           k8s_dnsmasq_kube-dns-86c47599bd-865pw_kube-system_3cac7428-8f21-11e8-a06a-020043fe033b_0
1cc37a3de744        55ffe31ac578                                                                                                     "/kube-dns --domai..."   39 minutes ago      Up 39 minutes                           k8s_kubedns_kube-dns-86c47599bd-865pw_kube-system_3cac7428-8f21-11e8-a06a-020043fe033b_0
91976d569cef        k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.1                                                                                             "/pause"                 39 minutes ago      Up 39 minutes                           k8s_POD_kube-dns-86c47599bd-865pw_kube-system_3cac7428-8f21-11e8-a06a-020043fe033b_0

It appears that sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images are now required for kube-dns deployment to work correctly. Thus the following default kube-dns images are used now: - k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-kube-dns-amd64:1.14.10 - k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-sidecar-amd64:1.14.10 - k8s.gcr.io/k8s-dns-dnsmasq-nanny-amd64:1.14.10 Signed-off-by: Rostislav M. Georgiev <[email protected]>

luxas

/lgtm
/approve
Thanks!

k8s-ci-robot · 2018-07-24T18:04:44Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: luxas, rosti

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~cmd/kubeadm/OWNERS~~ [luxas]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

luxas · 2018-07-24T18:10:34Z

/hold cancel

MrHohn · 2018-07-24T18:16:41Z

I was a bit baffled by this too, but it is true. Tried it with a clean setup in a VM with Kubernetes 1.11.1 and it indeed fetched the sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images and started them up:

Humm sorry I'm missing some context here. From kube-dns point of view these two images are always required since long ago (1.5ish?). This feels like some sort of pre-loading mechanism in kubeadm, does it work on earlier k8s versions?

k8s-github-robot · 2018-07-24T20:59:59Z

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 66291, 66471, 66499). If you want to cherry-pick this change to another branch, please follow the instructions here.

luxas · 2018-07-25T15:43:16Z

@rosti we might wanna cherrypick this bugfix into v1.11

neolit123 · 2018-07-25T15:46:36Z

i will cherry pick it tomorrow.

…499-origin-release-1.11 Automatic merge from submit-queue. Automated cherry pick of #66499: kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using Cherry pick of #66499 on release-1.11. #66499: kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using

k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot assigned luxas Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot added sig/cluster-lifecycle Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cluster Lifecycle. area/kubeadm labels Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot assigned timothysc Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jul 23, 2018

luxas approved these changes Jul 23, 2018

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot requested a review from MrHohn July 24, 2018 02:22

rosti force-pushed the kubedns-images branch from 2c5d2ca to fb7ba52 Compare July 24, 2018 10:35

k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 24, 2018

luxas approved these changes Jul 24, 2018

View reviewed changes

k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 24, 2018

luxas mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2018

Kubeadm has incorrect images list to bootstrap k8s 1.11 without internet kubernetes/kubeadm#1016

Closed

k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 24, 2018

k8s-github-robot merged commit 2755000 into kubernetes:master Jul 24, 2018

luxas mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2018

Cherrypick tracking issue for v1.11 kubernetes/kubeadm#958

Closed

9 tasks

neolit123 mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2018

Automated cherry pick of #66499: kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using #66679

Merged

rosti deleted the kubedns-images branch November 22, 2018 15:28

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns #66499

kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns #66499

rosti commented Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 23, 2018

neolit123 commented Jul 23, 2018

luxas left a comment

timothysc commented Jul 24, 2018

rosti commented Jul 24, 2018 •

edited

Loading

luxas left a comment

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2018

luxas commented Jul 24, 2018

MrHohn commented Jul 24, 2018

k8s-github-robot commented Jul 24, 2018

luxas commented Jul 25, 2018

neolit123 commented Jul 25, 2018

kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns #66499

kubeadm: Pull sidecar and dnsmasq-nanny images when using kube-dns #66499

Conversation

rosti commented Jul 23, 2018

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 23, 2018

neolit123 commented Jul 23, 2018

luxas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

timothysc commented Jul 24, 2018

rosti commented Jul 24, 2018 • edited Loading

luxas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

k8s-ci-robot commented Jul 24, 2018

luxas commented Jul 24, 2018

MrHohn commented Jul 24, 2018

k8s-github-robot commented Jul 24, 2018

luxas commented Jul 25, 2018

neolit123 commented Jul 25, 2018

rosti commented Jul 24, 2018 •

edited

Loading