Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add kubelet instance configuration to configure CRI socket for each node #3042

Open
HirazawaUi opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 12 comments
Open
Labels
area/kubelet kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Milestone

Comments

@HirazawaUi
Copy link

HirazawaUi commented Apr 5, 2024

Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST?

FEATURE REQUEST

Anything else we need to know?

This issue wants to remove container runtime interface (CRI) socket annotations from Node objects in Kubernetes and no longer added --container-runtime-endpoint args in kubeadm-flags.env ( --container-runtime-endpoint args deprecated in kubelet), this annotation and args are used to specify the CRI socket endpoint on each node that the kubelet uses to communicate with the container runtime.

Add kubelet-instance-config.yml locally to store container runtime interface (CRI) sockets, and in kubeadm init, join and upgrade, override the global kubelet configuration through kubelet-instance-config.yml.

More detailed design at: https://hackmd.io/@r2Yq-PVoRcK2OaGypnwPMg/rJFChACCp/edit

Tasks

No tasks being tracked yet.

edit by neolit123:

1.32

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Author

/cc @neolit123 @pacoxu

@HirazawaUi HirazawaUi changed the title FEATURE REQUEST: Add kubelet instance config FEATURE REQUEST: Add kubelet instance configuration to configure CRI socket for each node Apr 5, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

@HirazawaUi we need a KEP for this, ket's see what @pacoxu can comment about the previous work done on this.

@pacoxu can you please post links to your previous KEP work.?
also didn't we already have a tracking issue here in k/kubeadm?

maybe we can close KEP PRs and let @HirazawaUi to take over.

@neolit123 neolit123 added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. area/kubelet labels Apr 5, 2024
@neolit123 neolit123 added this to the v1.31 milestone Apr 5, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

also are you willing to work on this @HirazawaUi
there are a lot of things to update around this change across multiple releases. and i don't think me or anyone else will have a lot of time for it.

  • KEP design how is it going to work exactly, do we need a feature gate
  • k8s.io docs update
  • k/k code update
  • do we need a e2e test in k/kubeadm

too many questions

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Author

also are you willing to work on this @HirazawaUi there are a lot of things to update around this change across multiple releases. and i don't think me or anyone else will have a lot of time for it.

  • KEP design how is it going to work exactly, do we need a feature gate
  • k8s.io docs update
  • k/k code update
  • do we need a e2e test in k/kubeadm

too many questions

Yes, I'll try to finish it.

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Author

@pacoxu What do you think about this? I would love to hear your comments :)

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Apr 22, 2024

The KEP

My current proposal would be something like kubernetes/enhancements#3930 (comment)

i meant a generic patches approach where a local config file overrides the global config downloaded from the cm. not the --patches feature.

this local file must be stored somewhere. perhaps in the same dir as config.yaml, but called config-instance.yaml. IMO it has a number of tricky aspects that need to be covered in the design doc for init, join, upgrade.

Above is @neolit123 your proposal in comment here https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/3930/files#r1177682829.

I prefer this solution.

BTW, /var/lib/kubelet/kubeadm-flags.env will only have --container-runtime-endpoint later. I would like to make this cri-socket-annotation and runtime endpoint configuration to config-instance.yaml under /var/lib/kubelet.

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Author

Thanks, I have missed this comment, I will resurrect kep as soon as possible.

@neolit123 neolit123 changed the title FEATURE REQUEST: Add kubelet instance configuration to configure CRI socket for each node Add kubelet instance configuration to configure CRI socket for each node Jun 7, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

note if this ever becomes part of kubeadm, we can close this ticket:
#1924

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 1, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 1, 2024
@neolit123
Copy link
Member

@HirazawaUi i added some TODOs a tracking in the issue description here.
please keep it updated with links - ....

@HirazawaUi
Copy link
Author

@HirazawaUi i added some TODOs a tracking in the issue description here. please keep it updated with links - ....

OK, thank you so much for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/kubelet kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants