-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 715
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking issue for kubeadm integration with kustomize #1379
Comments
I'm not gonna have time to work on this quite yet, doing the other refactoring of the other components to use componentconfig first |
This is indeed a good idea, even if currently the pile of yaml is super fragmented across the kubeadm code base, and not always managed consistently. So it is important to decide since the beginning if we want kustomize applied selectively or if we should go for a deeper refactor: First generate all yamls, then kustomize, then apply to the cluster (kubeadm 2.0) Another thing we should define is what kind of support is provided for Kustomized cluster (for join/upgrades) |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
This is also potentially part of #683 for some recommended options. In particular there is a need to customise the static pod manifests created by kubeadm |
Is there any design proposal or PR for this feature request? |
@fabriziopandini i renamed the ticket and added kind/tracking issue. |
done in 1.16 |
@fabriziopandini: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This a FEATURE REQUEST?
A number of feature requests we've had over time have all centered around the idea plumbing through options into what eventually becomes the end-state of a pile of YAML. Some things make sense to expose as knobs, but other things don't.
The purpose of this issue is to explore the option and impact of what is would mean to add a kustomize step @ certain phases of YAML generation.
@neolit123 @fabriziopandini @luxas
design proposal (tracking issue/KEP): kubernetes/enhancements#1177
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: