Update the k8s.io/component-base KEP

[luxas]

Follow-up of kubernetes/community#2977
xref: kubernetes/community#2354 kubernetes/community#2515

cc @kubernetes/sig-cluster-lifecycle-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-api-machinery-pr-reviews
/assign @thockin @mtaufen @sttts @jbeda @DirectXMan12 @bgrant0607

[mtaufen]

Looks good

Thoughts on calling the wg "Component Standard"?

All these sound ok to me for a repo name:

• component-toolkit
• component-base
• component-foundation
• componentlib

[luxas]

Thoughts on calling the wg "Component Standard"?

As agreed with @mtaufen & @sttts and other stakeholders at the contrib summit, we're going with this WG name. This doc is updated to reflect that

component-base

After some bikeshedding on the names back and forth, we agreed that this is the best name we have at the moment. Before this is going "GA/stable", we could technically always rename this if there's a strong case later. Updated this proposal to reflect the k8s.io/component-base change.

This is ready to merge.

[mtaufen]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: luxas, mtaufen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• keps/sig-cluster-lifecycle/OWNERS [luxas]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment