-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
KEP-3488: Resolve outstanding issue: handling of enforcement #3576
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
label
Oct 3, 2022
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/kep
Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
sig/api-machinery
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
labels
Oct 3, 2022
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
label
Oct 3, 2022
jpbetz
force-pushed
the
enforcement
branch
3 times, most recently
from
October 3, 2022 20:20
074be4c
to
c594d24
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
label
Oct 3, 2022
jpbetz
changed the title
KEP-3488: Resolve outstanding issues, mark as implementable
KEP-3488: Resolve outstanding issue: handling of enforcement
Oct 3, 2022
lavalamp
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
lavalamp
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
lavalamp
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
lavalamp
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
lavalamp
reviewed
Oct 3, 2022
Co-authored-by: Daniel Smith <[email protected]>
Thanks @lavalamp! Feedback applied. |
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
label
Oct 3, 2022
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jpbetz, lavalamp The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
approved
Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files.
cncf-cla: yes
Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA.
kind/kep
Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory
lgtm
"Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
sig/api-machinery
Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery.
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reviewers: The "Decisions and Enforcement" section summaries the core change proposed.
Issue link: CEL for Admission Control #3488
Other comments: We only have 5 weeks to implement this so we're keeping phase 1 to a minimum. We will do more design work for phase 2, but believe we have enough information to implement phase 1 without painting ourselves into a corner.