-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Static Policy Proposal - Spread HT across physical CPUs #4176
Comments
/sig node |
/cc |
/stage alpha Applying the milestone as discussed at SIG Node meeting this week |
Hello 👋 1.30 Enhancements Lead here, I'm closing milestone 1.29 now, /milestone clear |
Sounds good. I will follow the instruction and move it to v1.30. We plan to polish it for further review. |
@salehsedghpour This is the initial issue and the PR is not merged yet. Could you help add v1.30 milestone? @SergeyKanzhelev @ffromani We will put some time to address all the comments recently |
Thanks for the info @Jeffwan, may you please follow it up so that you could also have the |
/stage alpha As discussed this is conditioned on the discussion on whether NRI approach will work better for this scenario |
/label lead-opted-in |
PRR reviewer here, is there a KEP PR for 1.30 for this enhancement? |
Hello @Jeffwan 👋, v1.30 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 9th February 2024. This enhancement is targeting for stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this KEP, we need to do the following:
The status of this enhancement is marked as |
@sreeram-venkitesh Thanks for the reminder. All the TODO items have been addressed and it's pending review. |
Hello 👋, v1.30 Enhancements team here. Unfortunately, this enhancement did not meet requirements for enhancements freeze. If you still wish to progress this enhancement in v1.30, please file an exception request. Thanks! |
/milestone clear |
@sreeram-venkitesh @salehsedghpour I filed an exception and waiting for sig-node to approve it. |
@mickeyboxell Thanks for reviewer's responsive feedback. kubernetes/kubernetes#123733 has been merged. I will finish the doc PR by end of week as well |
@Jeffwan can you add the docs PR in this issue description |
@LaurentGoderre done. Once the doc PR is merged, all three tasks for alpha release should be done. |
Hi @Jeffwan 👋, Enhancements team here. With all the implementation (code related) PRs merged as per the issue description: This enhancement is now marked as |
@Jeffwan we are getting ready for 1.32 planning. Are you interested in promoting this feature to beta in 1.32? |
Hi, enhancements lead here - I inadvertently added this to the 1.32 tracking board 😀. Please readd it if you wish to progress this enhancement in 1.32. /remove-label lead-opted-in |
/milestone v1.32 |
Hello @Jeffwan 👋, Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 11th October 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 10th October 2024. This enhancement is targeting for stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this KEP, we would just need to update the following:
The status of this enhancement is marked as If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you! |
PRR reviewer here. Is this still targeting v1.32? The PRR deadline is Thursday. Is there anything I can review? |
@Jeffwan Please respond. Otherwise, we will not consider this KEP for this release. |
Given the above, I am going to assume that this feature will no longer be tracked for 1.32. Please bring this feature up for 1.33. |
/milestone clear |
Enhancement Description
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): KEP-4176: A Static Policy Option to spread hyperthreads across physical CPUs #4177k/k
) update PR(s): KEP-4176: Add a new static policy SpreadPhysicalCPUsPreferredOption kubernetes#123733k/website
) update PR(s): Add docs for KEP-4176 new static policy DistributeCPUsAcrossCores website#47014 (comment)Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: