Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto remove PVCs created by StatefulSet #1847

Open
8 tasks done
kk-src opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 123 comments
Open
8 tasks done

Auto remove PVCs created by StatefulSet #1847

kk-src opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 123 comments
Assignees
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Milestone

Comments

@kk-src
Copy link

kk-src commented Jun 6, 2020

Enhancement Description

  • One-line enhancement description (can be used as a release note):
    Auto remove PVCs created by StatefulSet

  • Kubernetes Enhancement Proposal: KEP-1847: Auto remove PVCs created by StatefulSet.

  • Primary contact (assignee): @mattcary

  • Responsible SIGs: @sig-apps (with collaboration by @sig-storage)

  • Enhancement target (which target equals to which milestone):

    • Alpha release target 1.23
    • Beta release target 1.27
    • Stable release target 1.32

Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement

Resolves kubernetes/kubernetes#55045

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label Jun 6, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@kk-src: The label(s) sig/sig-storage cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

/sig sig-storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kk-src
Copy link
Author

kk-src commented Jun 6, 2020

/sig storage

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jun 6, 2020
@kk-src
Copy link
Author

kk-src commented Jun 6, 2020

/assign

@pacoxu
Copy link
Member

pacoxu commented Jun 19, 2020

@kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Jun 19, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pacoxu: Reiterating the mentions to trigger a notification:
@kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests

In response to this:

@kubernetes/sig-storage-feature-requests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

CC @dsu-igeek

@kk-src
Copy link
Author

kk-src commented Jun 19, 2020

Having discussions with @dsu-igeek @msau42 @mattcary
Should have a KEP with the proposal in shortly.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 17, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Hi @kk-src

Enhancements Lead here. Will there be any work for this in 1.20?

Also, as a reminder to be included in a release:

The KEP must be merged in an implementable state
The KEP must have test plans
The KEP must have graduation criteria.

Thanks
Kirsten

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

As per #1915 (comment)

marking this is as tracked.

Please note that Enhancements Freeze is October 6th, by which time to be included in the milestone:
The KEP must be merged in an implementable state (not yet merged & provisional)
The KEP must have test plans (missing)
The KEP must have graduation criteria (missing)

Best,
Kirsten

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 24, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

/milestone v1.20

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Sep 24, 2020
@mikejoh
Copy link

mikejoh commented Sep 29, 2020

Hi @kk-src 👋!

I'm one of the Enhancement shadows for the 1.20 release cycle. This is a friendly reminder that the Enhancement freeze is roughly one week from now on the 6th of October. I'm repeating the requirements needed by then:

  • The KEP must be merged in an implementable state.
    • It's provisional at the moment.
  • The KEP must have test plans.
    • Missing in the KEP.
  • The KEP must have graduation criteria.
    • Also missing in the KEP.

Let us know if you have any questions etc.!

Thanks!

@mikejoh
Copy link

mikejoh commented Oct 5, 2020

As a reminder, the Enhancements Freeze is Tomorrow October 6th EOD PST. All KEPs and updates must be merged by that time. After October 6th, you will need to request an Exception to be included in the 1.20 Release.

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Hi @kk-src

Enhancements Freeze is now in effect. Unfortunately, your KEP PR has not merged. If you wish to be included in the 1.20 Release, please submit an Exception Request as soon as possible.

Best,
Kirsten
1.20 Enhancements Lead

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice added tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team and removed tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Oct 7, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice removed this from the v1.20 milestone Oct 7, 2020
@kk-src
Copy link
Author

kk-src commented Oct 9, 2020

/remove-lifecycle stale

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

atiratree commented Aug 26, 2024

I think it would be better not to promote this feature in 1.32 due to the recent issues: kubernetes/kubernetes#126919 and kubernetes/kubernetes#122400. Mainly because the code changes in kubernetes/kubernetes#122499 were quite substantial and it would be better to wait to gain confidence in the StatefulSetAutoDelete feature.

@mattcary
Copy link
Contributor

That's reasonable. Catching more dependencies like the owner refs admissions plugin could take time.

The changes #122499 have been backported to 1.29 to increase the soak.

It's still some time until 1.32 (the release schedule link isn't even up yet), we can continue to monitor and decide what to do.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Oct 4, 2024

@mattcary I believe concerns raised by Filip are still in place, so why not holding this until 1.33?

@mattcary
Copy link
Contributor

mattcary commented Oct 4, 2024

Heh, I totally misread that comment as not promoting in 1.31.

Anyway, it doesn't matter to me. The feature's been in development for 4 years, it's been beta for a year. Nothing has changed in the API since it went beta. The risk of GAing it seems low -- maybe there is some bug like the owner policy change, but it's not likely to change the API. The risk of not GAing is similarly low, it's a minor feature few people care about.

I think the reality is that it's not going to get any usage if it's not GA. When it is GA it will get a little more. At this point I think it's more philosphical; do we want to avoid perma-beta or are we ok with multi-year development cycles?

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Oct 8, 2024

Fair point, I also once more looked at the e2es added in kubernetes/kubernetes#122499, those are running without problems for four months now, so I'm inclined to let this in. Although given we're quite late in the cycle it might be hard to go through the enhancement process, so keep that in mind.

/label lead-opted-in
/milestone v1.32
/stage stable

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the stage/beta Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Beta status label Oct 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot modified the milestones: v1.27, v1.32 Oct 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release labels Oct 8, 2024
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

dipesh-rawat commented Oct 8, 2024

Hello @mattcary 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 11th October 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 10th October 2024.

This enhancement is targeting for stage stable for v1.32 (correct me, if otherwise)

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • KEP readme using the latest template has been merged into the k/enhancements repo.
  • KEP status is marked as implementable for latest-milestone: v1.32.
  • KEP readme has up-to-date graduation criteria
  • KEP has a production readiness review that has been completed and merged into k/enhancements. (For more information on the PRR process, check here). If your production readiness review is not completed yet, please make sure to fill the production readiness questionnaire in your KEP by the PRR Freeze deadline on Thursday 3rd October 2024 so that the PRR team has enough time to review your KEP.

For this KEP, we would need to update the following:

  • Update kep.yaml to mention latest-milestone: v1.32
  • Ensure that the KEP has undergone a production readiness review and has been merged into k/enhancements.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for enhancement freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well.

If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this to At risk for enhancements freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Oct 8, 2024
@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hello @mattcary 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here,

Now that PR #4901 has been merged, all the KEP requirements are in place and merged into k/enhancements.

The status of this enhancement is now marked as tracked for enhancement freeze. Please keep the issue description up-to-date with appropriate stages as well. Thank you!

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from At risk for enhancements freeze to Tracked for enhancements freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Oct 10, 2024
@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat added the tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team label Oct 10, 2024
@michellengnx
Copy link

Hello @kk-src and @mattcary 👋, 1.32 Docs Shadow here.
Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modification to existing docs?
If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT.
Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!

@mattcary
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the ping, we probably have to update some beta -> GA verbiage. I'll open a placeholder.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

dipesh-rawat commented Oct 21, 2024

Hey again @mattcary 👋 v1.32 Enhancements team here,

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 8th November 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 7th November 2024 .

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs are open and need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

@mattcary Please let me know the PRs in k/k that are not listed in the description or not linked with this GitHub issue that we need to track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status.

The status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you!

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from Tracked for enhancements freeze to At risk for code freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Oct 21, 2024
@michellengnx
Copy link

Hello @kk-src and @mattcary 👋, 1.32 Docs Shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you!

Hello @kk-src and @mattcary 👋,

Just a reminder to open a placeholder PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo for this (steps available here). The deadline for this is 4 days away at Thursday October 24, 2024 18:00 PDT.

Thanks,
Michelle

@mattcary
Copy link
Contributor

Open draft placeholder PR kubernetes/website#48484

@wrkode
Copy link

wrkode commented Oct 24, 2024

👋 Hi there, William here from v1.32 Comms
We'd love for you to consider writing a feature blog about your enhancement! Some reasons why you might want to write a blog for this feature include (but are not limited to) if this introduces breaking changes, is important to our users, or has been in progress for a long time and is graduating.

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

Note: In your placeholder PR, use XX characters for the blog date in the front matter and file name. We will work with you on updating the PR with the publication date once we have a final number of feature blogs for this release.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hey again @mattcary 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here,

Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach code freeze in few days, at 02:00 UTC Friday 8th November 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 7th November 2024 .

The current status of this enhancement is marked as at risk for code freeze. There are a few requirements mentioned in the comment #1847 (comment) that still need to be completed.

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@dipesh-rawat
Copy link
Member

Hello @mattcary 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here

With all the implementation(code related) PRs merged as per the issue description:

This enhancement is now marked as tracked for code freeze for the v1.32 Code Freeze!

@dipesh-rawat dipesh-rawat moved this from At risk for code freeze to Tracked for code freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
Status: Graduating
Status: Tracked
Status: Tracked for code freeze
Status: Needs Triage
Development

No branches or pull requests