-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cleanup emeritus_reviewers and emeritus_maintainers from OWNERS files across kubernetes orgs #6334
Comments
/sig contributor-experience |
/good-first-issue |
@dims: GuidelinesPlease ensure that the issue body includes answers to the following questions:
For more details on the requirements of such an issue, please see here and ensure that they are met. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign |
So the idea here is to open a PR in each repository to remove the section with the wrong key namely:
When the reviewers ask we point them to this issue and say that the allowed keys are one of those mentioned here: or ping me on slack or here if there are any push backs. Also if someone else can help you, please carve out which repositories you each will tackle as there are a bunch of them. |
Oh! sorry if you see |
@Garima-Negi i've updated search url in #6334 (comment) and opened 2 PR(s) for |
- supported section name is `emeritus_approvers` (so add a `s`) - there isn't a supported section for emeritus reviewers (so remove the entire section) please see https://go.k8s.io/owners for additional info and kubernetes/community#6334 with a bunch of other cleanups we are doing.
/assign |
hi, @dims @Garima-Negi i've updated |
@dims what do we update |
@Garima-Negi yes please. |
/assign |
@dims looks like we are only waiting on [kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#185](Fix OWNERS files with allowed keywords kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#185) for this issue to be solved. I'[ll be squashing the commits and see if that moves it forward quickly. |
thanks @Garima-Negi |
@Garima-Negi we are waiting for you to addresss kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#185 (comment)... |
@pohly just pushed a commit to squash. Should be merged soon! Sorry for the delay |
kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#183 is the remaining open PR on this issue. But kubernetes-csi/csi-release-tools#185 has been merged already (these 2 PRs are duplicates) |
thanks for all your work on this @Garima-Negi !! |
/assign |
@k8s-ci-robot /assign |
/assign |
@dims Hello, do we have to change "emeritus_reviewers" to Reviewers? |
/assign |
/assign |
1 similar comment
/assign |
I want to work on this issue can you assign it to me? |
I think we have done a bunch of this. Closing this for now, we may do this again. |
Describe the issue
Following up from #6333 (comment) and #6333 (comment)
We need to cleanup https://cs.k8s.io/?q=emeritus_reviewers&i=nope&files=OWNERS*&excludeFiles=&repos= and https://cs.k8s.io/?q=emeritus_maintainers&i=nope&files=OWNERS*&excludeFiles=&repos= looks like we need to clean them all up
Original discussion in #3627 (comment)
Also see https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/guide/owners.md#owners for the list of official fields
Why are we solving this issue?
To address this issue, are there any code changes? If there are code changes, what needs to be done in the code and what places can the assignee treat as reference points?
emeritus_reviewers
oremeritus_maintainers
in their OWNERS files, submit a patch that removes these sectionsDoes this issue have zero to low barrier of entry?
How can the assignee reach out to you for help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: