Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ClusterStateRegistry to the AutoscalingContext #5905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

kisieland
Copy link
Contributor

Due to the dependency of the MaxNodeProvisionTimeProvider on the context
the provider was extracted to a dedicated package and injected to the ClusterStateRegistry after context creation.

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds ClusterStateRegistry to the AutoscalingContext, it will allow custom cloud providers to track the node group health.

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jun 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from x13n June 28, 2023 14:06
@kisieland
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @towca

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jun 30, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 3, 2023
Due to the dependency of the MaxNodeProvisionTimeProvider on the context
the provider was extracted to a dedicated package and injected to the
ClusterStateRegistry after context creation.
@towca
Copy link
Collaborator

towca commented Jul 4, 2023

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

Just one question/nit, feel free to unhold.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jul 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kisieland, towca

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 4, 2023
@kisieland
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4606cdf into kubernetes:master Jul 5, 2023
@kisieland kisieland deleted the auto-context branch July 5, 2023 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants