Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update OWNERS #67

Open
BenTheElder opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 13 comments · May be fixed by #69
Open

update OWNERS #67

BenTheElder opened this issue Jul 11, 2024 · 13 comments · May be fixed by #69

Comments

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

At least two of the four listed OWNERS are inactive in the organization

cc @nikhita @jeefy @kubernetes-sigs/sig-contributor-experience-leads

this repo is running critical infra but PRs are sitting unresponded, images are not getting promoted (#66) or deployed (#56) and probably have alarming CVEs (seeing as they're years old since the last builds and serving webhooks)

Can we add some active owners and clean this up?

I can spare a little time to help out here, I do not want to see a compromise for this infra and I've been working on getting everything migrated to the community at least.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Or maybe some of the slack-admins can chip in?

@jberkus
Copy link
Contributor

jberkus commented Jul 12, 2024

Lordy, yes.

OWNERS should be:

  • me
  • bob
  • jeefy
  • coderanger
  • cpanato (if he's still avail for this)
  • ContribEx TLs
  • k8s-infra TLs

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

gentle nudge @nikhita @jeefy @kubernetes-sigs/sig-contributor-experience-leads

cc proposed owners (per josh above) @jberkus @mrbobbytables @coderanger @cpanato @kubernetes-sigs/sig-contributor-experience-leads @upodroid @ameukam @dims (and me)

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Oct 9, 2024

+1

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Dec 16, 2024

I didn't realize I hadn’t responded here—apologies for the delay! Please feel free to remove me (and any other inactive owners). I think it’s best to update the list to include only those who can review and approve in a timely manner, rather than waiting on inactive folks.

Of course, we can always re-add people later if they’d like to contribute again.

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member Author

Hi folks, please ACK to confirm if you're willing to own this and will actively review/approve this repo:
@jberkus @mrbobbytables @coderanger @cpanato @kubernetes-sigs/sig-contributor-experience-leads @upodroid @ameukam @dims @xmudrii

And we'll get an OWNERS PR going ...

(I assume at least @cpanato, and I'm willing to help and I think this is important)

@ameukam
Copy link
Member

ameukam commented Dec 16, 2024

Not willing to own this. Sorry.

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Dec 16, 2024

I have been meaning to poke at what we have, so happy to review/approve

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Dec 16, 2024

Happy to review/approve and help with the infra side of things

@jberkus
Copy link
Contributor

jberkus commented Dec 16, 2024

ack

@cpanato
Copy link
Member

cpanato commented Dec 16, 2024

Ack and +1

@cpanato cpanato linked a pull request Dec 20, 2024 that will close this issue
@MadhavJivrajani
Copy link

ack

@Priyankasaggu11929
Copy link
Member

Hi folks, please ACK to confirm if you're willing to own this and will actively review/approve this repo

Ack. I can help review/approve. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

9 participants