Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

source/network: ignore interface operational state #814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2022

Conversation

marquiz
Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz commented May 13, 2022

Ignore the operational state of network interface when creating the
network SR-IOV labels. Previously NFD only considered interfaces which
were "up".

Pre v0.9 we used to check the "administrative state" of interfaces
(managed by the sysadmin with e.g. with ip link set dev down/up).
In v0.10 we changed to checking the "operational state" of interfaces,
reflecting whether the it is actually able to transfer data. Both these
checks have caused confusion among users and it is more understandable
and more aligned with other HW discovery functions in NFD to just drop
the state check. Also, the documentation is aligned with this behavior.

Fixes #812

Ignore the operational state of network interface when creating the
network SR-IOV labels. Previously NFD only considered interfaces which
were "up".

Pre v0.9 we used to check the "administrative state" of interfaces
(managed by the sysadmin with e.g. with ip link set dev <dev> down/up).
In v0.10 we changed to checking the "operational state" of interfaces,
reflecting whether the it is actually able to transfer data. Both these
checks have caused confusion among users and it is more understandable
and more aligned with other HW discovery functions in NFD to just drop
the state check. Also, the documentation is aligned with this behavior.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 13, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2022
@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

marquiz commented Jun 1, 2022

Ping @ArangoGutierrez @zvonkok

@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor Author

marquiz commented Jun 1, 2022

/cherry-pick release-0.11

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@marquiz: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-0.11 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@ArangoGutierrez ArangoGutierrez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The cable is not plugged!
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ArangoGutierrez, marquiz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@marquiz: new pull request created: #819

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@marquiz marquiz deleted the devel/network branch June 7, 2022 13:09
@marquiz marquiz mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2022
22 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NFD Operator not labeling SR-IOV capable nodes when operstate is not up
4 participants