Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: fix internal cross-page references by injecting .md #1030

Merged

Conversation

hirenp
Copy link
Contributor

@hirenp hirenp commented Jan 12, 2023

Fixing external references by injecting .md so that links works correctly while reading the documentation.

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Jan 12, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 12, 2023

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit bfbc47f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-nfd/deploys/63c629ec440fab0008e622eb
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1030--kubernetes-sigs-nfd.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @hirenp!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hirenp. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 12, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@ArangoGutierrez ArangoGutierrez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this PR! could you update the PR description with a small line detailing the change, so we keep a nice git history.

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 12, 2023
@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor

marquiz commented Jan 12, 2023

Thanks @hirenp for the PR. I guess you're reading the .md docs directly so that the links don't work. If we do this could you also fix all other references in a similar way

Something like this should give a good starting point, doing most of the work but possibly doing some incorrect edits and missing some, too:

# Remove all .md references
find docs/ -name '*.md' | xargs sed s'!.md#!!' -i

# Inject .md to all internal references
find docs/ -name '*.md' | xargs sed s'!(\([a-z0-9/.-]*[a-z]\)#\([a-z0-9-]*\))!(\1.md#\2)!' -i

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 12, 2023
@hirenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

hirenp commented Jan 12, 2023

Something like this should give a good starting point, doing most of the work but possibly doing some incorrect edits and missing some, too:
Thanks! That seemed to have done the trick. I tried spot checking a couple places and they look correct to me.

Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updater @hirenp. I found some mistakes, possibly because of erroneous sed script that I provided if you used them.

Could you also squash the PR into one commit and adjust the commit message accordingly, e.g. "docs: fix internal cross-page references by injecting .md" or smth

docs/get-started/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/get-started/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/get-started/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage/nfd-topology-gc.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage/nfd-topology-updater.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage/nfd-topology-updater.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/usage/nfd-worker.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hirenp hirenp force-pushed the hirenp/nfd_readme_typo_fix branch from f18001c to 51ee059 Compare January 14, 2023 00:28
@hirenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

hirenp commented Jan 14, 2023

Thanks for the updater @hirenp. I found some mistakes, possibly because of erroneous sed script that I provided if you used them.

Could you also squash the PR into one commit and adjust the commit message accordingly, e.g. "docs: fix internal cross-page references by injecting .md" or smth

Apologies for missing those. I fixed as per your suggestions.

@marquiz
Copy link
Contributor

marquiz commented Jan 16, 2023

Apologies for missing those. I fixed as per your suggestions.

Np, thanks for the update @hirenp. Looks good, now. Just one last nit: could you remove the inadvertent quotation mark (", a copy-paste mistake(?)) from the end of the commit message

/retitle docs: fix internal cross-page references by injecting .md

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Fixing noderesourcetopology reference. docs: fix internal cross-page references by injecting .md Jan 16, 2023
@hirenp hirenp force-pushed the hirenp/nfd_readme_typo_fix branch from 51ee059 to bfbc47f Compare January 17, 2023 04:54
@hirenp
Copy link
Contributor Author

hirenp commented Jan 17, 2023

Apologies for missing those. I fixed as per your suggestions.

Np, thanks for the update @hirenp. Looks good, now. Just one last nit: could you remove the inadvertent quotation mark (", a copy-paste mistake(?)) from the end of the commit message

🤦‍♂️

Fixed. Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@marquiz marquiz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hirenp, marquiz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@fmuyassarov fmuyassarov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 17, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: dd8cf32706de9c300668bc9336cea485c97f3be1

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 2bbdbf1 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jan 17, 2023
@marquiz marquiz mentioned this pull request Apr 12, 2023
24 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants