-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 769
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"onDelete: Delete"-Flag don't work #116
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
allow export registry name
Hello,
I'm trying to use the nfs-provisioner with 2 storage-classes:
The first for persistent data, independent from the container's lifecycle (onDelete: retain) and the second for transient data, depending from the container's lifecycle (onDelete: delete).
For the second one, in case of deleting the PVC (and the PV), I expect PVC, PV and the Files on the NFS-Server to be deleted.
But actually, the files remain on the NFS-Share.
I installed via Kustomize YAML-Files.
The Access Mode is
drwxrwxrwx 2 nobody nogroup 4096 Jun 24 14:42 nfs-pv1
so the accessing shouldn't be the problem.
Do I need some sort of custom user mapping?
Can anybody help?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: