Improve handling of known issues #632
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
serathius
force-pushed
the
knownissues
branch
from
47dd20c to
6b592cb
Compare
| @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@ | |||
| # Known issues | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what do you think about adding a TOC here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is good idea for both KNOWN_ISSUES.md and FAQ.md
To maintain TOC up to date we should have update and validate scripts, so I would propose to do this as a follow up
|
|
||
| Workaround: upgrade Docker to 1.19+ | ||
|
|
||
| ## Incorrectly configured front-proxy certificate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I found that the previous formatting made the text more readable, what do you think about applying it to all the issues?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By previous do you mean:
- formatting above
- formatting before this PR
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I meant the formatting above
* Extract known issues to separate file KNOWN_ISSUES.md * Describe case of missing pod metrics * Copy issue template header to bug reports to encaurage people to read existing documentation. Co-authored-by: Damien Grisonnet <[email protected]>
serathius
force-pushed
the
knownissues
branch
from
2664e43 to
076cb8b
Compare
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dgrisonnet, serathius The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
/cc @s-urbaniak