-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix document: replace a broken link on README.md #1041
Fix document: replace a broken link on README.md #1041
Conversation
|
Welcome @Shunpoco! |
Hi @Shunpoco. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ distributions. Please ensure that your cluster distribution supports these requi | |||
|
|||
[reachable from kube-apiserver]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/architecture/master-node-communication/#master-to-cluster | |||
[enable an aggregation layer]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/access-kubernetes-api/configure-aggregation-layer/ | |||
[authentication and authorization]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/command-line-tools-reference/kubelet-authentication-authorization/ | |||
[authentication and authorization]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/kubelet-authn-authz/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the fix.
I think the L148-L150 have also failed, could you repaired them together?
Line 148 in 115e821
[Kubernetes monitoring architecture]: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/design-proposals/instrumentation/monitoring_architecture.md |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I fixed.
As the document said, the design proposal is already archived. So I replaced links with the archive repository.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
/retest |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: serathius, Shunpoco The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Fix document: replace a broken link on README.md(cherrypick:https:#1041)
What this PR does / why we need it:
I found that the link returns 404. So I want to fix it.