-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 262
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Partial Admission] Check Mode before attempting Preemption #2809
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
I believe we should revisit the test coverage for the PartialAdmission feature as part of
#2799.
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: bea9931376c9e0f949a05daff5a14ff01a159ab7
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gabesaba, mimowo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
* Cleanup to use FlavorResourceQuantities.Add in cache (#2696) * fix: Refactor FitInCohort tests (#2655) * fix: Refactor FitInCohorot tests * fix: delete no-op function * fix: use new method to add usage * fix: to enforce resource group constraint for flavors and resources * fix: consolidated into a single resource group * fix: delete flavorNames * fix: adjusted test cases to align with existing expected conditions * fix: change FlavorResourceQuantitiesFlat value * Finish flattening of FlavorResourceQuantities (#2721) * Finish Flattenning FlavorResourceQuantities * Rename FlavorResourceQuantitiesFlat to FlavorResourceQuantities * Cleanup preemption.go (#2800) * [Partial Admission] Check Mode before attempting Preemption (#2809) * Prefer Reclamation to Priority Based Preemption (#2811) --------- Co-authored-by: s-shiraki <[email protected]>
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
We don't check
RepresentativeMode
before attempting preemption in thePartial Admission
path. This may result in a panic, if we enter the preemption path and find some targets.In the existing unit tests, we exit here, before encountering a panic here. See #2799 for more detail.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Related to #2799. Leaving that issue open, as related tests need to be updated
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?