Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #2025: Make the defaults for PodsReady backoff more practical #2033

Conversation

mimowo
Copy link
Contributor

@mimowo mimowo commented Apr 22, 2024

Cherry pick of #2025 on release-0.6.
#2025: Make the defaults for PodsReady backoff more practical
For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.

Make the defaults for PodsReadyTimeout backoff more practical, as for the original values
the couple of first requeues made the impression as immediate on users (below 10s, which 
is negligible to the wait time spent waiting for PodsReady). 

The defaults values for the formula to determine the exponential back are changed as follows:
- base `1s -> 10s`
- exponent: `1.41284738 -> 2`
So, now the consecutive times to requeue a workload are: 10s, 20s, 40s, ...

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.6 milestone Apr 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c029e44
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/66269e254115470008705101
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2033--kubernetes-sigs-kueue.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor Author

mimowo commented Apr 22, 2024

/assign @tenzen-y @alculquicondor

Copy link
Member

@tenzen-y tenzen-y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 55dd9b63a11c64898c78dcee57c01219f272f5f6

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@alculquicondor alculquicondor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

/release-note-edit

Make the defaults for PodsReadyTimeout backoff more practical, as for the original values
the couple of first requeues made the impression as immediate on users (below 10s, which 
is negligible to the wait time spent waiting for PodsReady). 

The defaults values for the formula to determine the exponential back are changed as follows:
- base `1s -> 10s`
- exponent: `1.41284738 -> 2`
So, now the consecutive times to requeue a workload are: 10s, 20s, 40s, ...

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Apr 22, 2024
@tenzen-y
Copy link
Member

It seems that we need to merge #2034 first.
/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2024
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think release-0.6 was affected

@mimowo
Copy link
Contributor Author

mimowo commented Apr 22, 2024

0.6 wasn't affected, that's why I needed to push the additional commit

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Apr 22, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 0eee98542050ffaf3bad9abb97dcd9e7b1a4cc0b

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, mimowo, tenzen-y

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [alculquicondor,tenzen-y]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f174c21 into kubernetes-sigs:release-0.6 Apr 22, 2024
13 checks passed
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

/kind bug

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label May 27, 2024
@mimowo mimowo deleted the automated-cherry-pick-of-#2025-upstream-release-0.6 branch May 29, 2024 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants