generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove deleted pending workloads from the cache so the visibility API results are correct #1679
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -362,6 +362,63 @@ var _ = ginkgo.Describe("ClusterQueue controller", ginkgo.Ordered, ginkgo.Contin | |
util.ExpectReservingActiveWorkloadsMetric(clusterQueue, 0) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
ginkgo.It("Should update status and report metrics when a pending workload is deleted", func() { | ||
workload := testing.MakeWorkload("one", ns.Name).Queue(localQueue.Name). | ||
Request(corev1.ResourceCPU, "5").Obj() | ||
|
||
ginkgo.By("Creating a workload", func() { | ||
gomega.Expect(k8sClient.Create(ctx, workload)).To(gomega.Succeed()) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
// Pending workloads count is incremented as the workload is inadmissible | ||
// because ResourceFlavors don't exist. | ||
gomega.Eventually(func() kueue.ClusterQueueStatus { | ||
var updatedCq kueue.ClusterQueue | ||
gomega.Expect(k8sClient.Get(ctx, client.ObjectKeyFromObject(clusterQueue), &updatedCq)).To(gomega.Succeed()) | ||
return updatedCq.Status | ||
}, util.Timeout, util.Interval).Should(gomega.BeComparableTo(kueue.ClusterQueueStatus{ | ||
PendingWorkloads: 1, | ||
FlavorsReservation: emptyUsedFlavors, | ||
FlavorsUsage: emptyUsedFlavors, | ||
Conditions: []metav1.Condition{ | ||
{ | ||
Type: kueue.ClusterQueueActive, | ||
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse, | ||
Reason: "FlavorNotFound", | ||
Message: "Can't admit new workloads: FlavorNotFound", | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
}, ignoreConditionTimestamps, ignorePendingWorkloadsStatus)) | ||
|
||
util.ExpectPendingWorkloadsMetric(clusterQueue, 0, 1) | ||
util.ExpectReservingActiveWorkloadsMetric(clusterQueue, 0) | ||
|
||
ginkgo.By("Deleting the pending workload", func() { | ||
gomega.Expect(k8sClient.Delete(ctx, workload)).To(gomega.Succeed()) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
// Pending workloads count is decrement as the deleted workload has been removed from the queue. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. non-blocking nit: same here - turn into ginkgo step |
||
gomega.Eventually(func() kueue.ClusterQueueStatus { | ||
var updatedCq kueue.ClusterQueue | ||
gomega.Expect(k8sClient.Get(ctx, client.ObjectKeyFromObject(clusterQueue), &updatedCq)).To(gomega.Succeed()) | ||
return updatedCq.Status | ||
}, util.Timeout, util.Interval).Should(gomega.BeComparableTo(kueue.ClusterQueueStatus{ | ||
PendingWorkloads: 0, | ||
FlavorsReservation: emptyUsedFlavors, | ||
FlavorsUsage: emptyUsedFlavors, | ||
Conditions: []metav1.Condition{ | ||
{ | ||
Type: kueue.ClusterQueueActive, | ||
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse, | ||
Reason: "FlavorNotFound", | ||
Message: "Can't admit new workloads: FlavorNotFound", | ||
}, | ||
}, | ||
}, ignoreConditionTimestamps, ignorePendingWorkloadsStatus)) | ||
util.ExpectPendingWorkloadsMetric(clusterQueue, 0, 0) | ||
util.ExpectReservingActiveWorkloadsMetric(clusterQueue, 0) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
ginkgo.It("Should update status when workloads have reclaimable pods", func() { | ||
|
||
ginkgo.By("Creating ResourceFlavors", func() { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
non-blocking nit: I would prefer to turn the comment into ginkgo step. Maybe ginkgo.By("await until the pending workload count is incremented as the workload is inadmissible, because the ResourceFlavors don't exist"). This way the comment is also logged, which can make debugging easier.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. Actually I saw an existing comment and somehow decided to choose that style, but I would have chosen the
ginkgo.By
stanza otherwise. Let me know if you feel like it's worth I open a follow-up PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't notice the PR was approved actually, and thought you would have time to apply the remark.
I'm ok either way, as you feel.