Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider priority across ClusterQueues in a cohort #1024

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2023

Conversation

alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

When a CQ "A" with StrictFIFO strategy has pending workloads, it can block admissions in another CQ "B" in the same cohort with newer workloads, if they cannot be immediately admitted either, as introduced in #475 and #805. This allows CQ "A" to reclaim quota as soon as running workloads finish.
However, higher priority workloads should be able to be admitted first.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Prevent workloads in ClusterQueue with StrictFIFO from blocking higher priority workloads in other ClusterQueues in the same cohort that require preemption

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 28, 2023
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 28, 2023

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit fed61fc
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-kueue/deploys/64c3de87ce3bce00082c6807

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 28, 2023
@trasc
Copy link
Contributor

trasc commented Jul 31, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4cc5fad into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 31, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.5 milestone Jul 31, 2023
@alculquicondor
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-0.4

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@alculquicondor: new pull request created: #1030

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-0.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants