Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 fix: (helm/v1alpha1): Add missing prefixes in various k8s resources #4388

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

monteiro-renato
Copy link
Contributor

Hey 👋
I've added missing prefixes to k8s resources (except for cert-manager ones)
I've added 4 commits so it's easier to review.
I will delete the helm-install.yaml file and squash the commits after the review.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @monteiro-renato. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 25, 2024
@@ -0,0 +1,1161 @@
---
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand that you added this to make it easier to review the changes, and it seems like an interesting approach.

However, it appears this was done manually. All the files generated under testdata are created using the shell script found at generate.sh. We cannot manually add or modify content in this directory. Instead, the logic for generating these files needs to be incorporated into the script. Also, the action that calls it will need to have helm installed. We check if the testdata is updated with the PR changes to allow get it merged see: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/.github/workflows/testdata.yml

Additionally, if we decide to include this change, we must ensure that the helm-install.yaml file is re-generated when running the Makefile target. This ensures consistency and alignment with the existing build and test automation processes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this change would need to be in an PR only for that.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@monteiro-renato monteiro-renato Nov 25, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @camilamacedo86,
The helm-install.yaml was indeed created manually but as I mentioned, it was only to make the review easier.
I've deleted it and squashed the commit now 👍.
I do think having a diff of the generated manifests makes it a lot easier to do reviews. It might be something to consider having as part of the normal pipeline.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

Hi @monteiro-renato

Thank you for looking on this. See my comment: #4388 (comment)

I think we need to split this PR, and for we get merged, we should have only one commit, ideally.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, monteiro-renato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 25, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 077dea8 into kubernetes-sigs:master Nov 25, 2024
22 checks passed
@monteiro-renato monteiro-renato deleted the patch-1 branch November 25, 2024 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants