Order gang scheduled jobs based on time of arrival

[adam-marek]

What this PR does / why we need it:
The ordering of equal priority gang scheduled jobs is currently based on the job's namespace/name which is unintuitive when multiple users schedule jobs competing for the same resources.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #454

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

Equal priority gang scheduled jobs will be ordered by their time of creation.

[k8s-ci-robot]

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

---

• If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
• If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please sign in with your organization's credentials at https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/projects/cncf to be authorized.
• If you have done the above and are still having issues with the CLA being reported as unsigned, please email the CNCF helpdesk: [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[adam-marek]

I am a member of the CNCF Intel Corporation group. My email is [email protected]

[TravisBuddy]

Travis tests have failed

Hey @adam-marek,
Please read the following log in order to understand the failure reason.
It'll be awesome if you fix what's wrong and commit the changes.

1st Build

View build log

make verify

go build -o _output/bin/deepcopy-gen ./cmd/deepcopy-gen/
_output/bin/deepcopy-gen -i ./pkg/apis/scheduling/v1alpha1/ -O zz_generated.deepcopy
hack/verify-gofmt.sh
diff -u ./pkg/scheduler/plugins/gang/gang.go.orig ./pkg/scheduler/plugins/gang/gang.go
--- ./pkg/scheduler/plugins/gang/gang.go.orig	2018-11-01 22:23:59.289164644 +0000
+++ ./pkg/scheduler/plugins/gang/gang.go	2018-11-01 22:23:59.289164644 +0000
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
 		if !lReady && !rReady {
 			if lv.PodGroup.GetCreationTimestamp().Time.Equal(rv.PodGroup.GetCreationTimestamp().Time) {
 				if lv.UID < rv.UID {
-					return -1;
+					return -1
 				}
 			} else if lv.PodGroup.GetCreationTimestamp().Time.Before(rv.PodGroup.GetCreationTimestamp().Time) {
 				return -1
make: *** [verify] Error 1

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 50fc6850-de27-11e8-b084-61188e6c7303

[k82cn]

hm... we need to add a new field into JobInfo, the creation-timestamp is from PodGroup or PDB. And we will check jobInfo's creation time here. We need to support PDB as tf-operator is using it, we will remove it at least after 0.4 release.

[adam-marek]

Something along these lines ? (3f0dfd8)

[TravisBuddy]

Hey @adam-marek,
Something went wrong with the build.

TravisCI finished with status errored, which means the build failed because of something unrelated to the tests, such as a problem with a dependency or the build process itself.

View build log

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 5954b640-e08b-11e8-90db-29214a2b47d8

[k82cn]

LGTM overall! let’s get it merged when CI is happy :)

[k82cn]

please sign cla

[k82cn]

/approve
/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adam-marek, k82cn

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [k82cn]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[adam-marek]

CLA should be signed now