Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve config for multi node scenario #130

Closed
fabriziopandini opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #147
Closed

Improve config for multi node scenario #130

fabriziopandini opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 1 comment · Fixed by #147
Assignees
Labels
lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor.
Milestone

Comments

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

as per #117 (comment), one of the step for implementing multi node support is to improve Kind config in order to support the concept of topology: how many control-plane nodes should be in the cluster? how many worker nodes? should I add an external-load balancer? add an external-etcd?

A first high level idea for the new config design is something in the middle between current Kind config and cluster api. This imply the config will be composed by a combination of following objects:

  • a Cluster object for "cluster wide settings"
  • a Nodeobject (or Container/Machine to avoid confusion with Kubernets Nodeobject) for "node specific settings"
  • eventually a NodeSet (or ContainerSet/MachineSet) object for defining groups of machines starting from a template

The new config api should be ready for supporting following use cases:

  • different CRI/different node-image (and mixed clusters)
  • version skew (between control-plane and kubelet or between nodes)
  • volume mounts
  • kubeadm config patching (should apply only to the bootstrap control-plane node?)
  • LifecycleHooks (in which forms, considering different types of nodes?)
  • Adding/Removing nodes to the cluster
  • ...

Opinions about the proposed api design?
Preferences on object names?
Are there other use cases to be supported (in the first release)? Are there use cases not necessary (in the first release)?

/assign

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/lifecycle active

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor. label Nov 27, 2018
This was referenced Nov 29, 2018
@BenTheElder BenTheElder added this to the 1.0 milestone Dec 13, 2018
stg-0 pushed a commit to stg-0/kind that referenced this issue Jun 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/active Indicates that an issue or PR is actively being worked on by a contributor.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants