Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question regarding masquerading all, lets say SSH only, egress traffic to a lot of destinations as sourced from limited number of fixed IPs #54

Closed
nabheet opened this issue May 16, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@nabheet
Copy link

nabheet commented May 16, 2020

I apologize if I this is not the correct place to ask this question, but I didn't see directions on how/where to ask questions, maybe I missed them. Also, I have a limited understanding of iptables, routing and masquerading.

Like a lot of people on the internet, I have a need to change the source IPs on our outbound SSH connections because the remote SSHD has restrictions by IP address.

Assuming our cluster has, lets say 3, nodes with a fixed IP (Nodes A, B, C), but there are more nodes (lets say 20) in the cluster, is there a way for all the outgoing SSH connections from all the pods (not on Nodes A, B, C) to have the fixed IP from nodes A, B or C.

I am not sure if I am asking this question correctly but I am hoping that someone would say "Oh yeah, thats easy! You forward all your port 22 traffic to Nodes A, B or C round-robinly (or pick one node), and then set up some kind of MASQ rule or something on Nodes A, B and C to forward that one to the remote destination from the ethernet device with the fixed IP." or something ...

I am assuming that using a limited number of fixed public IPs might be better than adding a fixed public IP to every node in the cluster. Also, I am thinking that this might be better than using SSH proxy hops as each SSHD connection would use up a decent chunk of memory/resources on the proxy hop. We make a lot of outbound SSH calls.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated and thank you in advance for your help!

@nabheet nabheet changed the title Question regarding masquerading all, lets say SSH only, egress traffic to limited number of fixed IPs Question regarding masquerading all, lets say SSH only, egress traffic to a lot of destinations as sourced from limited number of fixed IPs May 16, 2020
@bowei
Copy link
Contributor

bowei commented May 27, 2020

This sounds something similar to:

kubernetes/enhancements#1105

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 25, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Sep 24, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants