Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release v0.6.2 #1814

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
50 changes: 50 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@

## Table of Contents

- [v0.6.2](#v062)
- [v0.6.1](#v061)
- [v0.6.0](#v060)
- [v0.6.0-rc2](#v060-rc2)
Expand All @@ -22,6 +23,55 @@
- [v0.1.0-rc2](#v010-rc2)
- [v0.1.0-rc1](#v010-rc1)

# v0.6.2

This is a patch release that predominantly includes updated conformance tests
for implementations to implement.

For all major changes since the `v0.5.x` release series, please see the
[v0.6.0](/#v060) release notes.

## Maintenance

- As per [changes in upstream to container image registries] we replaced all
usage of the k8s.gcr.io registry with registry.k8s.io.
(#1736, @shaneutt)

[changes in upstream to container image registries]:https://github.com/kubernetes/k8s.io/issues/4738

## Bug Fixes

- Fix invalid HTTP redirect/rewrite examples.
(#1787, @Xunzhuo)

## Conformance Test Updates

- The `HTTPRouteInvalidCrossNamespaceParentRef` conformance test now checks for
the `NotAllowedByListeners` reason on the `HTTPRoute`'s `Accepted: false`
condition to better indicate why the route was note accepted.
(#1714, @skriss)
- A conformance test was added for `HTTPRoute` to cover the behavior of a
non-matching `SectionName` similar to what was already present for
`ListenerPort`.
(#1719, @zaunist)
- Fixed an issue where tests may fail erroneously on the removal of resources
that are already removed.
(#1745, @mlavacca)
- Logging in conformance utilities related to resource's `ObservedGeneration`
has been improved to emit the `ObservedGenerations that are found for the
purpose of making it easier to debug test failures and be more verbose about
the objects in question.
(#1761, @briantkennedy)
(#1763, @briantkennedy)
- Patch instead of update in some places in conformance tests to reduce noise
in logs.
(#1760, @michaelbeaumont)
- Added `AttachedRoutes` testing to conformance tests.
(#1624, @ChaningHwang)
- The conformance tests always check that the HTTPRoute ResolvedRefs condition
is enforced, even when the status is true.
(#1668, @mlavacca)

# v0.6.1

This is a patch release that predominantly includes updated conformance tests
Expand Down

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion config/webhook/admission_webhook.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ spec:
spec:
containers:
- name: webhook
image: gcr.io/k8s-staging-gateway-api/admission-server:v0.6.1
image: gcr.io/k8s-staging-gateway-api/admission-server:v0.6.2
imagePullPolicy: Always
args:
- -logtostderr
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions config/webhook/certificate_config.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ spec:
spec:
containers:
- name: create
image: k8s.gcr.io/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.1.1
image: registry.k8s.io/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.1.1
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
args:
- create
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ spec:
spec:
containers:
- name: patch
image: k8s.gcr.io/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.1.1
image: registry.k8s.io/ingress-nginx/kube-webhook-certgen:v1.1.1
imagePullPolicy: IfNotPresent
args:
- patch
Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions conformance/tests/gateway-invalid-route-kind.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ var GatewayInvalidRouteKind = suite.ConformanceTest{
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonInvalidRouteKinds),
}},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand All @@ -64,6 +65,7 @@ var GatewayInvalidRouteKind = suite.ConformanceTest{
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonInvalidRouteKinds),
}},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions conformance/tests/gateway-invalid-tls-certificateref.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ var GatewayInvalidTLSConfiguration = suite.ConformanceTest{
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonInvalidCertificateRef),
}},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

testCases := []struct {
Expand Down
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions conformance/tests/gateway-observed-generation-bump.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import (

"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"
"sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/client"

"sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api/apis/v1beta1"
"sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api/conformance/utils/kubernetes"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -69,8 +70,8 @@ var GatewayObservedGenerationBump = suite.ConformanceTest{
},
})

err = s.Client.Update(ctx, mutate)
require.NoErrorf(t, err, "error updating the Gateway: %v", err)
err = s.Client.Patch(ctx, mutate, client.MergeFrom(original))
require.NoErrorf(t, err, "error patching the Gateway: %v", err)

// Ensure the generation and observedGeneration sync up
kubernetes.NamespacesMustBeAccepted(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, namespaces)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ var GatewaySecretInvalidReferenceGrant = suite.ConformanceTest{
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonRefNotPermitted),
}},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ var GatewaySecretMissingReferenceGrant = suite.ConformanceTest{
Status: metav1.ConditionFalse,
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonRefNotPermitted),
}},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ var GatewaySecretReferenceGrantAllInNamespace = suite.ConformanceTest{
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerConditionProgrammed),
},
},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ var GatewaySecretReferenceGrantSpecific = suite.ConformanceTest{
Reason: string(v1beta1.ListenerReasonProgrammed),
},
},
AttachedRoutes: 0,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
Expand Down
77 changes: 77 additions & 0 deletions conformance/tests/gateway-with-attached-routes.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
/*
Copyright 2022 The Kubernetes Authors.

Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at

http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
*/

package tests

import (
"testing"

metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types"

"sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api/apis/v1beta1"
"sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api/conformance/utils/kubernetes"
"sigs.k8s.io/gateway-api/conformance/utils/suite"
)

func init() {
ConformanceTests = append(ConformanceTests, GatewayWithAttachedRoutes)
}

var GatewayWithAttachedRoutes = suite.ConformanceTest{
ShortName: "GatewayWithAttachedRoutes",
Description: "A Gateway in the gateway-conformance-infra namespace should be attached to routes.",
Manifests: []string{"tests/gateway-with-attached-routes.yaml"},
Test: func(t *testing.T, s *suite.ConformanceTestSuite) {
t.Run("Gateway listener should have one valid http routes attached", func(t *testing.T) {
gwNN := types.NamespacedName{Name: "gateway-with-one-attached-route", Namespace: "gateway-conformance-infra"}
listeners := []v1beta1.ListenerStatus{{
Name: v1beta1.SectionName("http"),
SupportedKinds: []v1beta1.RouteGroupKind{{
Group: (*v1beta1.Group)(&v1beta1.GroupVersion.Group),
Kind: v1beta1.Kind("HTTPRoute"),
}},
Conditions: []metav1.Condition{{
Type: string(v1beta1.ListenerConditionAccepted),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

coincidentally this is the first conformance test that actually asserts on ListenerConditionAccepted so it might cause a little friction, there are a few tests using Programmed for similar assertions (e.g. GatewaySecretReferenceGrantAllInNamespace)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As I understand it this is more of a calling out than a request for change. Let me know if I'm misunderstood, however.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah just a callout in case anyone else sees an issue with it

Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "", //any reason
}},
AttachedRoutes: 1,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
})

t.Run("Gateway listener should have two valid http routes attached", func(t *testing.T) {
gwNN := types.NamespacedName{Name: "gateway-with-two-attached-routes", Namespace: "gateway-conformance-infra"}
listeners := []v1beta1.ListenerStatus{{
Name: v1beta1.SectionName("http"),
SupportedKinds: []v1beta1.RouteGroupKind{{
Group: (*v1beta1.Group)(&v1beta1.GroupVersion.Group),
Kind: v1beta1.Kind("HTTPRoute"),
}},
Conditions: []metav1.Condition{{
Type: string(v1beta1.ListenerConditionAccepted),
Status: metav1.ConditionTrue,
Reason: "", //any reason
}},
AttachedRoutes: 2,
}}

kubernetes.GatewayStatusMustHaveListeners(t, s.Client, s.TimeoutConfig, gwNN, listeners)
})
},
}
Loading