generated from kubernetes/kubernetes-template-project
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 492
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify semantics when port_redirect is unset #1740
Merged
k8s-ci-robot
merged 5 commits into
kubernetes-sigs:main
from
arkodg:clarify-port-redirect-default
Mar 10, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3bf771a
Clarify semantics when port_redirect is unset
arkodg f5cbbb8
also clarify empty host_redirect case
arkodg 5297de1
update based on GAPI community meeting guidance
arkodg 89250ac
gen crds
arkodg 4d51132
incorporate Nick's suggestion
arkodg File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
46 changes: 32 additions & 14 deletions
46
config/crd/experimental/gateway.networking.k8s.io_httproutes.yaml
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
46 changes: 32 additions & 14 deletions
46
config/crd/standard/gateway.networking.k8s.io_httproutes.yaml
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is confusing to me, when we say the "port must be omitted" who are we talking to? Is this a direction for users or implementers?
cc @arkodg @shaneutt
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should I change
must
towill
so it caters to both parties ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think what we're trying to say is the following:
I'm not actually sure that's what we're trying to say, and what I wrote above is still rather confusing, but maybe it's at least clear that the guidance is intended for implementers?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suggest reading through this thread #1740 (comment) and sharing your feedback, we are saying ports
80
and443
should never be appended to theLocation
headerThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that overall idea makes sense, it's just not clear to me in the current variation of the spec, moving this to #1806 so we don't lose track of the discussion.