Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ v1.29: Prepare quickstart, capd and tests for the new release including kind bump #9872

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

chrischdi
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi commented Dec 13, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

Modify quickstart and CAPD to use the new Kubernetes release:

TODO's:

  • Wait for dependend PR to merge
  • Rebase after above got merged
  • Wait for kindest/node image to be released for v1.29.0
  • Fix open TODO(chrischdi)'s to set proper SHA's to the new image
  • verify the quickstart manually

Follow-up

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #9578

/area testing

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 13, 2023
@chrischdi chrischdi force-pushed the pr-main-1-29 branch 2 times, most recently from cbdb8cf to 0c5d8ca Compare December 15, 2023 11:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 15, 2023
@chrischdi chrischdi marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2023 11:08
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 15, 2023
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-dualstack-and-ipv6-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-28-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-scale-main-experimental

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @sbueringer

test/e2e/autoscaler_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/clusterctl_upgrade_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

test/e2e/config/docker.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/e2e/config/docker.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Dec 15, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

/hold

Feel free to merge once CI is green and the commits are squashed one way or another :)

(Please track the follow-ups of bumping the remaining places to 1.29 somewhere on the issue)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Dec 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: e7dc20d64186e1eaed610f099b559e68704fac92

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2023
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/lgtm

Just squashed

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

/lgtm

Just squashed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

Final verification after rebase:

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 298656b2aa87536adc4923fda0efea03ecef921b

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm pending two questions

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ var _ = Describe("When testing clusterctl upgrades (v1.6=>current)", func() {
InitWithBinary: fmt.Sprintf(clusterctlDownloadURL, stableRelease),
InitWithProvidersContract: "v1beta1",
// Note: Both InitWithKubernetesVersion and WorkloadKubernetesVersion should be the highest mgmt cluster version supported by the source Cluster API version.
InitWithKubernetesVersion: "v1.28.0",
InitWithKubernetesVersion: "v1.29.0",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

q: should we change also WorkloadKubernetesVersion? (same below)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have to wait until 1.6.1. before that it won't work as 1.6 doesn't have a mapping for the 1.29 image

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(xref last task in #9578 (comment))

COREDNS_VERSION_UPGRADE_TO: "v1.10.1"
KUBERNETES_VERSION_MANAGEMENT: "v1.29.0"
KUBERNETES_VERSION: "v1.29.0"
KUBERNETES_VERSION_UPGRADE_FROM: "v1.28.0"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Q: should be use v1.28.4 instead? (it is ok to do this as a follow up)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There seems to be no kind image for it

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 19, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit cd844c3 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 19, 2023
21 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.7 milestone Dec 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants