Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Minor fixes for CC+MP implementation #9318

Merged

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Aug 25, 2023

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]

What this PR does / why we need it:
Follow-up to #9016

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Part of #5991

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Aug 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 25, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title Minor fixes for CC+MP implementation 🌱 Minor fixes for CC+MP implementation Aug 25, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer added the area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass label Aug 25, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label Aug 25, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-mp-squashed-nits branch from 70b5b75 to 6ea4042 Compare August 25, 2023 20:07
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wow, contains some important fixes!

Thanks

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 44a196f447a4a46a657c26b5466143810d4afb0c

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-mp-squashed-nits branch from 6ea4042 to f55a233 Compare August 28, 2023 15:21
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from chrischdi August 28, 2023 15:21
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-mp-squashed-nits branch from f55a233 to e292b46 Compare August 28, 2023 15:54
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 28, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Should be ready for review now (@chrischdi sorry I did another iteration)

/assign @killianmuldoon @chrischdi

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot

This comment was marked as resolved.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-28-latest-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Aug 28, 2023

/assign @willie-yao
PTAL as well (and no worries, I just found a bit more when reviewing another 2-3 times :D)

Copy link
Contributor

@willie-yao willie-yao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one minor nit from my end. Thanks for all the fixes! I definitely missed a lot of things 😅

internal/topology/check/compatibility.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Just one minor nit from my end. Thanks for all the fixes! I definitely missed a lot of things 😅

No worries. I'm working since 1-2 years on ClusterClass and also missed them in the first few rounds of reviews

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

Only willie's nit, as of that lgtm :-)

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-cc-mp-squashed-nits branch from e292b46 to 8965f4c Compare August 29, 2023 09:48
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-28-latest-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 35b18819d4b32db3c3ba8881d8712fd711255988

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!
/lgtm
/approve

/hold
For the full CI run.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: killianmuldoon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 29, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8cb4d00 into kubernetes-sigs:main Aug 29, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.6 milestone Aug 29, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-cc-mp-squashed-nits branch August 29, 2023 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants