Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release 0.1.0 #861

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2019
Merged

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Contributor

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 29, 2019
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ export KUBEBUILDER_CONTROLPLANE_START_TIMEOUT ?=60s
export KUBEBUILDER_CONTROLPLANE_STOP_TIMEOUT ?=60s

# Image URL to use all building/pushing image targets
export CONTROLLER_IMG ?= gcr.io/k8s-cluster-api/cluster-api-controller:latest
export CONTROLLER_IMG ?= gcr.io/k8s-cluster-api/cluster-api-controller:0.1.0
export EXAMPLE_PROVIDER_IMG ?= gcr.io/k8s-cluster-api/example-provider-controller:latest
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note that I am not changing the EXAMPLE_PROVIDER_IMG ... I figure that's for CI and we should not release it (?)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that correct

/cc @figo

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI will set the EXAMPLE_PROVIDER_IMG based on git hash at runtime. so the tag latest here does not matter, hence no need to change.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we prepend the version with a v (note I'm not overly opinionated either way)?

Copy link
Member

@vincepri vincepri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb, vincepri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from figo March 29, 2019 20:41
@justinsb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Starting to document the deltas from the pre-numbered release process in #862

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants